I prefer homebuilt as well, but Apple, while overpriced in my opinion, has some of the most solidly built hardware I have ever seen. If only they had an option with no Apple on the front, and no OSX, for $100-200 less... Yeah, I would buy that.
The new Mac Mini.
Moderator: Moderators
-
palmertech
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
- Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies
Re: The new Mac Mini.
Have YOU ever felt an apple case?
I prefer homebuilt as well, but Apple, while overpriced in my opinion, has some of the most solidly built hardware I have ever seen. If only they had an option with no Apple on the front, and no OSX, for $100-200 less... Yeah, I would buy that.
I prefer homebuilt as well, but Apple, while overpriced in my opinion, has some of the most solidly built hardware I have ever seen. If only they had an option with no Apple on the front, and no OSX, for $100-200 less... Yeah, I would buy that.

Excellent
-
Black Six
- Moderator
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:34 pm
- 360 GamerTag: Black 5ix
- Location: MD
Re: The new Mac Mini.
I currently own and actively use two Macs, and have used them all my life, so yes I've felt the case, and I think they're well built and well designed. I'm not sure what you're talking about with the thermal paste, but manufacturing errors happen all the time with any company, quality control can't stop everything. I'm just talking about in general.XCVG wrote:Haven't you ever heard the stories about the three tubes of thermal paste? Or actually FELT the case. These things are cheap garbage that they charge you an exhorbitant amount for, because it's a Mac. Apple stuff is not quality. It's probably because everything else is so cheap, people lack perspective now.Black Six wrote:If there's one thing I've learned about Apple it's that you get quality.
I'm sticking with my homebuilt PC.
Did I post that out loud?
EDIT: Okay, sorry about that rant. I don't like Macs, I think they are overpriced, and I am a really function over form person. (as my Ugly Voltage Regulator can attest)
"It's not that life's so short, it's just that you're dead for so long." -Anonymous
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
Re: The new Mac Mini.
Yeah, I just really hate mac. Closed, proprietory, and a ripoff to boot.
-
gamemasterAS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
- Steam ID: lolz1337face
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
Re: The new Mac Mini.
If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.
You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
.
Re: The new Mac Mini.
$300 later...


-
palmertech
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
- Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies
Re: The new Mac Mini.
How is the keyboard? I like that matte finish, while not as sexy as the HP 2140 all metal case, it looks nice. 

Excellent
Re: The new Mac Mini.
Is that what I think it is?
an eee pc hackintosh
an eee pc hackintosh
Re: The new Mac Mini.
It's an MSI Wind, heh. The black matte is beauuutiful, I couldn't be more satisfied. The keyboard is compact, but a hell lot easier to use than any other netbook's I've tried out.
-
gamemasterAS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
- Steam ID: lolz1337face
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
Re: The new Mac Mini.
Same laptop as I have, they really are awesome. Only thing is I let it rst between my legs to much when cross legged so I ruined the cord and need to get a new one. 
.
Re: The new Mac Mini.
If I could get a nice Linux machine that size but with the same keyboard as a Tandy 102 I would be a very happy man.
Emulation isn't accurate. There is no substitute for real hardware!
Re: The new Mac Mini.
The problem is that I don't want vista-provided AMD garbage with only DDR2 and a lesser video card, especially not from HP. Also, the lower power consumption means quite a bit to me in that I can leave it on all the time without the power bill going up (apart from that, it's just ~6x6x2 inches)gamemasterAS wrote:If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.
You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
My extra gigabyte of DDR3 ram cost me 12 dollars, I installed it myself.
...
-
gamemasterAS
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
- Steam ID: lolz1337face
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
Re: The new Mac Mini.
I am not a fan of AMD but that "AMD crap" is .2ghz faster and is quad core. Also, I think it would be better to have 6 gigs of ram then 1. Also if you know how to install ram I think you can figure out how to install xp or even osx.Bibin wrote:The problem is that I don't want vista-provided AMD garbage with only DDR2 and a lesser video card, especially not from HP. Also, the lower power consumption means quite a bit to me in that I can leave it on all the time without the power bill going up (apart from that, it's just ~6x6x2 inches)gamemasterAS wrote:If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.
You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
My extra gigabyte of DDR3 ram cost me 12 dollars, I installed it myself.
.
Re: The new Mac Mini.
Some Pentium 4 processors run at 3.06GHz. Does that mean it's better than my 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo? I would receive no benefit from quad core; quad does not necessitate more speed, but rather improved multitasking and simultaneous threads.gamemasterAS wrote:I am not a fan of AMD but that "AMD crap" is .2ghz faster and is quad core. Also, I think it would be better to have 6 gigs of ram then 1. Also if you know how to install ram I think you can figure out how to install xp or even osx.Bibin wrote:The problem is that I don't want vista-provided AMD garbage with only DDR2 and a lesser video card, especially not from HP. Also, the lower power consumption means quite a bit to me in that I can leave it on all the time without the power bill going up (apart from that, it's just ~6x6x2 inches)gamemasterAS wrote:If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.
You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
My extra gigabyte of DDR3 ram cost me 12 dollars, I installed it myself.
That, and that rather large box consumes a lot of power in contrast as well as puts out more noise. OSX86 is buggy and statistically slower, and while I have ran it on multiple machines I would never want to rely on it.
...
Re: The new Mac Mini.
Well, while you're talking 'bout AMD "crap". I just put the highest specced (3.0Ghz) AMD Quad-core Behemoth into my newly built rig, and I'm getting great performance for a decent price. I usually prefer Intel, but when I saw a combo deal with my GPU and that, I couldn't pass it up.

We Didn't Start The Fire! Watch!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5pjoRZNzC0
Andrew wrote:{I was so happy} I was singing in my head!
me wrote:What song?
Andrew wrote:All of them