The new Mac Mini.

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

palmertech
Senior Member
Posts: 3225
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by palmertech »

Have YOU ever felt an apple case? :wink:

I prefer homebuilt as well, but Apple, while overpriced in my opinion, has some of the most solidly built hardware I have ever seen. If only they had an option with no Apple on the front, and no OSX, for $100-200 less... Yeah, I would buy that. :lol:
Image

Excellent
Black Six
Moderator
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:34 pm
360 GamerTag: Black 5ix
Location: MD

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by Black Six »

XCVG wrote:
Black Six wrote:If there's one thing I've learned about Apple it's that you get quality.
Haven't you ever heard the stories about the three tubes of thermal paste? Or actually FELT the case. These things are cheap garbage that they charge you an exhorbitant amount for, because it's a Mac. Apple stuff is not quality. It's probably because everything else is so cheap, people lack perspective now.

I'm sticking with my homebuilt PC.

Did I post that out loud?

EDIT: Okay, sorry about that rant. I don't like Macs, I think they are overpriced, and I am a really function over form person. (as my Ugly Voltage Regulator can attest)
I currently own and actively use two Macs, and have used them all my life, so yes I've felt the case, and I think they're well built and well designed. I'm not sure what you're talking about with the thermal paste, but manufacturing errors happen all the time with any company, quality control can't stop everything. I'm just talking about in general.
"It's not that life's so short, it's just that you're dead for so long." -Anonymous
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
XCVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by XCVG »

Yeah, I just really hate mac. Closed, proprietory, and a ripoff to boot.
gamemasterAS
Senior Member
Posts: 3310
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
Steam ID: lolz1337face
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by gamemasterAS »

If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.

You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
.
Skyone
Moderator
Posts: 6390
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:35 pm
Location: it is a mystery
Contact:

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by Skyone »

$300 later...

Image
palmertech
Senior Member
Posts: 3225
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by palmertech »

How is the keyboard? I like that matte finish, while not as sexy as the HP 2140 all metal case, it looks nice. :D
Image

Excellent
XCVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by XCVG »

Is that what I think it is?

an eee pc hackintosh
Skyone
Moderator
Posts: 6390
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:35 pm
Location: it is a mystery
Contact:

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by Skyone »

It's an MSI Wind, heh. The black matte is beauuutiful, I couldn't be more satisfied. The keyboard is compact, but a hell lot easier to use than any other netbook's I've tried out.
gamemasterAS
Senior Member
Posts: 3310
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
Steam ID: lolz1337face
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by gamemasterAS »

Same laptop as I have, they really are awesome. Only thing is I let it rst between my legs to much when cross legged so I ruined the cord and need to get a new one. :(
.
arfink
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:12 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by arfink »

If I could get a nice Linux machine that size but with the same keyboard as a Tandy 102 I would be a very happy man.
Emulation isn't accurate. There is no substitute for real hardware!
Bibin
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by Bibin »

gamemasterAS wrote:If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.

You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
The problem is that I don't want vista-provided AMD garbage with only DDR2 and a lesser video card, especially not from HP. Also, the lower power consumption means quite a bit to me in that I can leave it on all the time without the power bill going up (apart from that, it's just ~6x6x2 inches)

My extra gigabyte of DDR3 ram cost me 12 dollars, I installed it myself.
...
gamemasterAS
Senior Member
Posts: 3310
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
Steam ID: lolz1337face
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by gamemasterAS »

Bibin wrote:
gamemasterAS wrote:If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.

You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
The problem is that I don't want vista-provided AMD garbage with only DDR2 and a lesser video card, especially not from HP. Also, the lower power consumption means quite a bit to me in that I can leave it on all the time without the power bill going up (apart from that, it's just ~6x6x2 inches)

My extra gigabyte of DDR3 ram cost me 12 dollars, I installed it myself.
I am not a fan of AMD but that "AMD crap" is .2ghz faster and is quad core. Also, I think it would be better to have 6 gigs of ram then 1. Also if you know how to install ram I think you can figure out how to install xp or even osx.
.
Bibin
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by Bibin »

gamemasterAS wrote:
Bibin wrote:
gamemasterAS wrote:If it was 600 bucks and then more for all those upgrades I would say that was a pretty expensive computer for what you got.

You Could have got this for example
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6883107862
The problem is that I don't want vista-provided AMD garbage with only DDR2 and a lesser video card, especially not from HP. Also, the lower power consumption means quite a bit to me in that I can leave it on all the time without the power bill going up (apart from that, it's just ~6x6x2 inches)

My extra gigabyte of DDR3 ram cost me 12 dollars, I installed it myself.
I am not a fan of AMD but that "AMD crap" is .2ghz faster and is quad core. Also, I think it would be better to have 6 gigs of ram then 1. Also if you know how to install ram I think you can figure out how to install xp or even osx.
Some Pentium 4 processors run at 3.06GHz. Does that mean it's better than my 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo? I would receive no benefit from quad core; quad does not necessitate more speed, but rather improved multitasking and simultaneous threads.

That, and that rather large box consumes a lot of power in contrast as well as puts out more noise. OSX86 is buggy and statistically slower, and while I have ran it on multiple machines I would never want to rely on it.
...
ian2120
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:48 am
Location: NY, US, Earth

Re: The new Mac Mini.

Post by ian2120 »

Well, while you're talking 'bout AMD "crap". I just put the highest specced (3.0Ghz) AMD Quad-core Behemoth into my newly built rig, and I'm getting great performance for a decent price. I usually prefer Intel, but when I saw a combo deal with my GPU and that, I couldn't pass it up.
Image
We Didn't Start The Fire! Watch!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5pjoRZNzC0
Andrew wrote:{I was so happy} I was singing in my head!
me wrote:What song?
Andrew wrote:All of them
Post Reply