Canon Digital Cameras Are Crap!

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
G-force
Moderator
Posts: 3609
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Sweet home Indiana
Contact:

Canon Digital Cameras Are Crap!

Post by G-force »

Apparently over time they will build up junk in the lense and it will show an error message on the screen saying "E18". Then all it will do is turn on for a couple seconds, display "E18" and shut off (with the lens still out!). :( Now I have to open it up, open the lense, clean it out and hope it works when I turn it on.

That's the only solution I have found so far, if anybody has any other ideas, please post them. I'm goin nuts here cause I REALLY don't want to open it up, I saw a pic of the insides and it's messy in there! :shock:

ARGHHHH!!!! I hate crappy electronics! :evil:
nos_slived
Higher Idiot
Posts: 3476
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by nos_slived »

Have you contacted tech support?
Image
HK-47
Moderator
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:17 pm
Location: /dev/moderator/
Contact:

Post by HK-47 »

Reaperman@home
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:19 am
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:

Post by Reaperman@home »

maybe you didn't spend enough on your canon. all companies sell cheap cameras. I bet canon's cheapies aren't even made by canon--most big name cheap cameras are actually made by somebody else.
G-force
Moderator
Posts: 3609
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Sweet home Indiana
Contact:

Post by G-force »

Yeah I tried tech support. They said I could get it repaired for $150 :roll:

It's not a cheapo camera either. At the time my dad bought it, it was the best you could get. It's a 3.2 mgp, not that great anymore, but it gets the job done. It cost around $300 and we only had it for 2-3 years, so you can see why I'm pissed off at cannon. We took good care of it too, carried it in a case and everything!

Anyways, I already ripped it apart. If I can get it back together it will be a miracle :wink:

So now you all have fair warning, if you buy a cannon camera, this could be you! :(
soundwave
Senior Member
Posts: 3653
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:51 pm
Location: Connecticut

Post by soundwave »

I got stuck with a 115 dollar, 2.1mp Canon. My mother bid on that and a 2.1mp Nikon (which is alright). Thinking she'd lose both (they had like 10 minutes left each), she ended up winning both, and I got stuck paying fr the Canon, which takes 4 AAs and gets horrible battery life (maybe half an hour if im lucky, more with the screen off, which then just defeats the point of having a digital camera).
nos_slived
Higher Idiot
Posts: 3476
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by nos_slived »

LMFAO! I was reading that, and when I read Nikon, I looked at my TV and they had a commercial for Nicon cameras! That happens to me a lot! Freaky! The commercial was for $1500 camera though, so yours' sound cheap! I just used a lot of exclamation marks!
Image
gannon
Moderator
Posts: 6974
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Near that one big lake
Contact:

Post by gannon »

I have a sony mavica. Even though it's big and isn't the best quality it's a beast and is pretty hard to break :) I also have a cheapo 3mp camera, but it takes fuzzy pics after I only dropped it once (dropped the mavica plenty of times, still fine :P)
soundwave
Senior Member
Posts: 3653
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:51 pm
Location: Connecticut

Post by soundwave »

I was going to get a nice 450 dollar 5mp nikon back in march (200 dollar mail in rebate) but was at a loss for 450 dollars.
Reaperman@home
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:19 am
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:

Post by Reaperman@home »

2-3 years isn't a bad lifespan for a point-and-shoot digi--or anything else electronic for that matter. Think about it, how well do your cell phones, pdas, even PCs hold up after three years? Generally they'll come across problems requiring massive repair or replacement.

even the big digitals have a rated life and will require regular cleaning of the CCD/CMOS. Of course you can expect to pay far more for service then.

It also sounds like your lens grew some mold (usually white or gray). Unfortunately, there's no way to clean it economically. Prevention is the only way, but even stored in a case, and in a dry area it still sometimes hits.

Ebay hint: there's no such thing as "a little bit of mold" on a lens.
Turbo Tax 1.0
Portablizer Extraordinaire
Posts: 4773
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Delaware, no sales tax
Contact:

Post by Turbo Tax 1.0 »

i like Nikon coolpix thats the kind my brother got and my dad liked it so he got a knewer version
when life gives you lemons make flux
Image
snesp mk4
sam
Senior Member
Posts: 1746
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:23 am
Location: toronto
Contact:

Post by sam »

Reaperman@home wrote:2-3 years isn't a bad lifespan for a point-and-shoot digi--or anything else electronic for that matter. Think about it, how well do your cell phones, pdas, even PCs hold up after three years? Generally they'll come across problems requiring massive repair or replacement.

even the big digitals have a rated life and will require regular cleaning of the CCD/CMOS. Of course you can expect to pay far more for service then.

It also sounds like your lens grew some mold (usually white or gray). Unfortunately, there's no way to clean it economically. Prevention is the only way, but even stored in a case, and in a dry area it still sometimes hits.

Ebay hint: there's no such thing as "a little bit of mold" on a lens.
Uh, computer last more than 3 year. Mind you if you dont buy quality parts. They will become outdated before they need repair. But my computer work s perfectly and I got it 2 summers ago.
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Post by bicostp »

Ours is a 4.5MP Cannon (A80 I think.) We've had it for quite a while now with no problems.

/me hopes I didn't jinx myself. :P

3.2MP is fine, it's the minimum resolution for lab-quality 8x10 prints.

It sure beats the school camera- a 1MP Home Shopping Channel, cheap-China-import Sweatshop Special. One of the teachers brought it home with them on the week before school ended, and it got stolen out of their car at the mall. LMAO.
Reploid Ayla
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:08 pm
Location: Portland

Post by Reploid Ayla »

oh i have a Canon AE-1 slr from waaaaaaaayyyyy back. Like futher than the wayback machine, and it works great still. This camera is from the 70's and it works like new. Problem? The new age. Digital can eat balls. Not only in picture quality, but by the fact that most if not all pictures from digital cameras look like snapshots, even if you set them up for a quality shot. they suck for photographs. But they arent bad for snapshots. Every brand will decline in quality from the digital age on, and that (imo) is fact.

so you're out of luck bucko. use that 150 on repair for even a new slr...(make sure it isnt automatic advance, then it'll cost a female of the dog species to repair it) haha
Image
Post Reply