My stomach went SOur

gamer2 · Post by **gamer2** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:57 pm

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 50,00.html

Reaperman@home · Post by **Reaperman@home** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 2:04 pm

what's the matter with this?
the US has never given up pre-emptive strike capability, and is just expanding it to more targets. unless I missed the entire point of this rather dull piece.

Honestly, the world isn't a happy place. It's better than hearing "we knew in advance and could have prevented this tragedy with a single tactical nuke from a nearby submarine, but the president didn't have the authority"

sam · Post by **sam** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:09 pm

I would like to see some stop the president.... the un? hah.

goodie · Post by **goodie** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:27 pm

That bugs me. What makes the US think they have the right to tell other countries what to do? They don't. As long as they're not using them, it shouldn't matter if other countries have powerful weapons. Of course, if they attack us then we should go ahead and punish them appropriately. I don't see the US getting rid of their powerful weapons. Why should they expect other countries to? Hypocrites...

Surfin_Fool · Post by **Surfin_Fool** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:34 pm

lol
and people dont understand why america is hated

Reaperman@home · Post by **Reaperman@home** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:40 pm

goodie wrote:I don't see the US getting rid of their powerful weapons. Why should they expect other countries to? Hypocrites...

we are, as part of a treaty with russia. It's a slow decrease.

Post by **SpongeBuell** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:45 pm

Even though I like where the discussion is going, I should probably lock this, Ben doesn't like politics on the boars. sorry, guys.

Post by **gannon** » Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:53 pm

I agree