To sum up my thoughts:
- First and foremost, DDR is SDRAM, because it is synchronous. The full acronym is Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Read Only Memory (or DDRSDRAM). It's one of those things that makes me wonder why it persists, but oh well.
- gannon: DDR is faster than "SDRAM" (PC100 or PC133). Sorry. And it costs more. That is what is wrong with it. Of course PC133 works just like PC3200 but it is slower and costs more for the same density. Why? Sticks aren't being manufactured by anyone major anymore. So you end up having to pay the same amount for RAM made by shady manufacturers.
- FDSMAN: Unless he has no boss. And there are a LOT of stupid bosses in the world. BTW, I have to kinda agree with Doofus. Either you needed the math or implied that we're idiots and needed the math, so you're kinda in the wrong either way. And "that took math to do?" isn't an insult worth spouting a paragraph-long post about. Honestly, I don't know why you posted this at all. I think this belongs in the group of posts that wastes bandwidth, along with posts such as "I lost my controller!" Unless something extraordinary happened in your daily life, I doubt many people care. I bought a digital camera, MP3 player, etc. this week (I went a bit nuts) but I didn't post every time, nor did I say "I should go buy a digicam!" before doing it. Just go do it, for crying out loud!
Sorry for the long rant, but I had to say it.
- Doofus: Pricewatch sucks and is full of a bunch of shady outfits that sell overclocked RAM and CPUs to suckers. Don't ever recommend it, as it will make you look bad. You'd be 100 times better off if you forgot it existed and used some mix of Fatwallet, Anandtech forums, Newegg and similar respectable retailers, and Froogle.
Sorry if this post sounds like I'm talking down to everyone. Not the intention. Just trying to create some clarity.
(At least I didn't say that DDR is 2*1 = 2 times faster than SDRAM.)
