Indepentdent Film

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

HK-47
Moderator
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:17 pm
Location: /dev/moderator/
Contact:

Post by HK-47 »

Heres some more movie related stuff Ben wrote:
http://www.benheck.com/Movies/Bare%20Minimums.htm
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

Well I read that already. Theres a link on the movie page. Or there was.
Sparkfist
Forum Administrator
Posts: 6754
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Sparkfist »

The thing is if you need more light you many cameras can have a larger lamp attached to it, I'd just be sure to get a hologen or (more expencive) LED one for more white light.

And White Balance I have that feture on my (old ass) Beta Max camcoreder. I thougt it was for setting true colors not adjusting to the color of the light. Guess I learned something today.

On thing Jack to keep an eye out for is a quaility stabliser. I cant rememeber how many times my dad has critisised the Sony cams that came out after his. The Hi-8 he has uses a gyroscopic mechonisium to keep the view steady well maby newer ones modify the image itself to make it apear to be steable. This is really just useful if you dont plan to use a pod of any kind ot ensure the camera's steady.
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too

I am a geek.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

I plan on using a tripod. Also the funny thing is Im filming only parts of the movie because Im in a lot of it. I am directing the shots though eh whatever. Also should my film be analog or digital in nature. Good camcorders are cheaper when they are analouge. Digial ones are like3,000
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

I've been looking and this one looks good. It used to be professional. Its SVHS so its good quality analouge. Manual Focus mic in.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... Track=true
what do you think
PS- Dont bid or ill cut you :)
My only concern is that in the end I am goning to edit it on a computer and burn it to a dvd. Origanly being analouge will this hurt its quality?
Sparkfist
Forum Administrator
Posts: 6754
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Sparkfist »

Thats more of your personal preference, as even Ben's critisised the whole digintal wave of movies. DV is really high up there, if your want to best analoge I think you shoulf look for one that has it uncomprssed the thing is that will take a lot of room on the media and your hard drive. Digital will be easier to inport to you computer and edit.
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too

I am a geek.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

Well I have a 200gb firewire hdd for my computer. I think thats enough for about 2 hours of movie
HK-47
Moderator
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:17 pm
Location: /dev/moderator/
Contact:

Post by HK-47 »

JackFrost22 wrote:I've been looking and this one looks good. It used to be professional. Its SVHS so its good quality analouge. Manual Focus mic in.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... Track=true
what do you think
PS- Dont bid or ill cut you :)
My only concern is that in the end I am goning to edit it on a computer and burn it to a dvd. Origanly being analouge will this hurt its quality?
If you are transfering the movie to a computer via a capture card, it shouldnt if the card is good quality. Of couse, everything does degrade a bit every time to go analog to digital, or digital to analog - sorta like a photocopier. The image gets worse every time you copy it. But for $50, Id say thats not too bad.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

Also its svhs. i know this sounds stupid but it uses regular vhs tapes and the way its recorded is svhs.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

Well I found a great way to get free actors. Say you will have a refreshment table (it really works). I'll start filming once I get my camera.
benheck
Site Admin
Posts: 1887
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin - Land of Beer and Cheese and Beer
Contact:

Post by benheck »

I didn't rag on DV! I rag on DVD! There's a big difference!

200 gigs of hard drive space will hold 13.8 hours of DV video (data rate of about 4 megs/second) I'd suggest having 5-6 times as much space as you intend your final movie to be. (so 200 gig should be OK) Usually you don't capture EVERY TAKE of a shot but you might capture the 2 best for options, and of course that clip will be longer on the ends so you have editing room. This increases the total amount of drive space used.

For PW I shot about 36 hours of video, and about 120 gigs worth went onto my computer (about 8 hours worth) For a 90 minute movie! (but I do 5-10 takes for every shot minimum and there's lots of support files/FX renders)

I would suggest getting a DV camera with a Firewire. Then the actual data is sent to your computer and there's no generational loss. With an analog camera the analog video must be converted using an analog capture card (not easy to find these days) and you'll have a generation loss.
benheck
Site Admin
Posts: 1887
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin - Land of Beer and Cheese and Beer
Contact:

Post by benheck »

Oh, I also WOULDN'T recommend getting a SVHS or anything VHS camera. Couple reasons:

1) It's OLD and even though SVHS has more lines of res it doesn't compare to DV

2) The tape transport (rewinding, fast forwarding, checking what you just shot) is WAY WAY WAY better and faster on DV cameras compared to VHS.

3) Camera is physically bigger which can limit your shot composition, especially when you not using sets with removable walls!

Take it from me - "I know video" (In Keanu Reeves voice)
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

So like a sony handycam would be fine? Like a nice one. Cause they all use firewire. I've always wanted to make a film and I have a good screenplay. Shakey shots are not a problem cause Im going to use a tripod as much as possible. I have like $200 I guess Ill save up a little more and buy one on eBay.
SpongeBuell
Senior Member
Posts: 5190
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:52 am
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Post by SpongeBuell »

you know, this wouldn't be a bad excuse to get a mac mini, since that has iLife and all. Yes, it is $500, but it does include iMovie :)
Life of Brian wrote:
RYW wrote:RYW:

Rare
Yellow
Weasel
I'll be honest with you - I would have never guessed that.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

Hello I have a job offer at the apple store. I start in 2 weeks(spring break)Then a 10 or 15% discount thats 50 or like 60 dollars off :D
EDIT- http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 27791&rd=1
THis camera loks good I asked him for the reserve $100 :shock:
What do you guys think
PS- Same as always if you bid i cut you
Last edited by JackFrost22 on Sun Feb 27, 2005 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply