Unix

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Unix

Post by JackFrost22 »

Ive been running Linux for as long as I can remember. Well actually since I was 5 before that my dad said the family's computer was dos based. I am familiar with unix. But I dont have a computer that it is installed on. So I know theres Netbsd openbsd and freebsd. Which one is better. And also I heard that slackware is the most unix like linux.
vb_master
Moderator
Posts: 4793
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 9:52 pm

Post by vb_master »

I like Mandrakelinux.
gannon
Moderator
Posts: 6974
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Near that one big lake
Contact:

Post by gannon »

I myself use Fedora core 2 on most of my PCs. I also use DSL for some of my older boxes, but it lacks a lot of features. I never actually got FreeBSD to run on any of the machines I installed it on :?
SpongeBuell
Senior Member
Posts: 5190
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:52 am
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Post by SpongeBuell »

SuSE is great for me. good interface (though it's basically a slightly modified version of KDE) and a lot of good programs are included. Also, it uses YaST, an awesome installer for a lot of stuff.
Life of Brian wrote:
RYW wrote:RYW:

Rare
Yellow
Weasel
I'll be honest with you - I would have never guessed that.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

I see no one really understood my post which UNIX is better OpenBSD FreeBSD or NetBSD :roll:
MM007
Moderator
Posts: 1175
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 6:01 pm
Location: In the wilds of suburbia...

Post by MM007 »

I tried Mandrake 10.0, but I don't know much about Linux... All I really know is Windows stuff and how to mount and access my drives.
Warranty-Voiding fun!

Image
gannon
Moderator
Posts: 6974
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Near that one big lake
Contact:

Post by gannon »

And as I said,
gannon wrote:I never actually got FreeBSD to run on any of the machines I installed it on :?
So I guess while that doesn't help much, it shows that freeBSD isn't too easy to install.

Edit:
Also, BSD isn't the only form of unix, so you should've asked which of the 3 are better.
HK-47
Moderator
Posts: 3598
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:17 pm
Location: /dev/moderator/
Contact:

Post by HK-47 »

Im running Fedora Core 3. Its pretty good. Nice interface, good features. It takes a bit of work to get java but its good after that.
Sparkfist
Forum Administrator
Posts: 6754
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Sparkfist »

Ok break down of what Free, Net and Open's advanages are. FreeBSD is the more main stream of the three it also supports more of the main stream platforms. NetBSD is the porter, they support like 50+ platforms and is from the looks of it very flexible. OpenBSD which is based off Net focuses on security.

All seem very good, and so you know FreeBSD also has more online documentation and books to read on it then the other two.

And as all three are free, its up to you to decide which is best. Note that you need atleast 4mb ram to run Free.
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too

I am a geek.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

thanks and is your avatar a scottie dog?
gotchocolatemilk2
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:46 pm
Location: Manhappinin' kansas

Post by gotchocolatemilk2 »

does anyone know what would be the best linux to run on a 400mhz pentium 2 machine?
"sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will cause permanent physcological damage"
gannon
Moderator
Posts: 6974
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Near that one big lake
Contact:

Post by gannon »

how much ram?
SpongeBuell
Senior Member
Posts: 5190
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:52 am
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Post by SpongeBuell »

gotchocolatemilk2 wrote:does anyone know what would be the best linux to run on a 400mhz pentium 2 machine?
It really does depend on RAM quite a bit, as gannon mentioned. I would recommend getting 128MB. If you have 64, you might be able to get by with it. Try it out and see if it's fast enough. As for the distro, I would try SuSE to start, since it's good for beginners and still has good functionalities. 9.1 would probably be ok. If it's too slow, try 8.1. If that's too slow, then Red Hat is probably your best bet. I believe I have used Red Hat 9 on a PII 333, 96MB RAM, but I don't remember how it was. Red Hat 8 should be fine if that is too slow. Keep in mind that I have had trouble gtting RH to work with my network card.
Life of Brian wrote:
RYW wrote:RYW:

Rare
Yellow
Weasel
I'll be honest with you - I would have never guessed that.
Sparkfist
Forum Administrator
Posts: 6754
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Sparkfist »

JackFrost22 wrote:thanks and is your avatar a scottie dog?
Yes it is my dog (scottie-westie mix), his name is Macbeth.

As for a distro to use. Yes it depends on Ram more than Processor speed. Linux isnt widows and so doesnt hog resources. Most distros will work with as little as 4mb but you cant use a GUI (Graphical User Iterface), to use a GUI atleast 35mb is needed and for that use a simple on like blackbox or fluxbox as KDE and Gnome use more ram.
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too

I am a geek.
JackFrost22
Sir Posts-alot
Posts: 4186
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 4:10 pm

Post by JackFrost22 »

Well i am almopst done with insalling OpenBSD on my i586 (for those who dont know Pentium 1) I just gotta reconfigure the kernal and repartition my drives.
Post Reply