I have a solution

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

Sparkfist
Forum Administrator
Posts: 6754
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Sparkfist »

Extreme_Jesus wrote:because the parents are looking for a scapegoat to blame, rather than admit that their child was not all their in the brain department
It's more shallow then that. The parents don't want to be labled as negligent or non-involved parents. Think of it, it's easier to say "VIDEO GAMES DID IT TO OUR SWEET CHILD!", than "Yeah we didn't bother to pay attention to what our kid did, we were to busy ignoring them to bother."
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too

I am a geek.
CronoTriggerfan
Moderator
Posts: 4131
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Contact:

Post by CronoTriggerfan »

Well, I think this is a good idea. Sparkfist raisies a good point about movie ratings being hidden on boxes; however, movie-based media is far larger than video games, so movies are widely advertised with a certain rating. Plus, they have age limits at theaters and the rating is very clearly posted on signs and whatnot. Personally, I feel this idea would rating awareness in parents, especially with all the asswipe games that shouldn't be marketed *cough* GTA *couhg*

Also, a quote from Shanghai Knights you British need to hear:
"It was a little thing called the American Revolution. They had thousands of soldiers in nice uniforms with rifles and we had a few dirt farmers with pitchforks and we beat 'em like a drum."

--Roy O'Bannon explaining the Revolution to Chong Wang in London, Shanghai Knights, SAM! (JK, lol )

CronoTriggerfan
Image
gamer2
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:38 pm
Location: You spam, SANTA Jason gets you!
Contact:

Post by gamer2 »

The ESRB is a bit vague with the rating systems. Maybe going with the European rating system could work out. Its colorfull, higher on the packaging, and it clearly shows the proper age group (My Shenmue II euopean copy is rated 11+, much clearer than "T")
Image
Image
Harshboy
Portablizer
Posts: 3610
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:44 pm

Post by Harshboy »

no one cares about ratings on videogames...neither movies.....this is total spam and will turn into flaming central. Closerize this!
gamer2
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:38 pm
Location: You spam, SANTA Jason gets you!
Contact:

Post by gamer2 »

Hey Harashboy, dont undermine the autority of the Mods, thats one of the rules.
Image
Image
Sparkfist
Forum Administrator
Posts: 6754
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:12 am
Location: Michigan

Post by Sparkfist »

Harshboy wrote:no one cares about ratings on videogames...neither movies.....
I can argue this point. I know some people that have kids and they will not let then see PC=13 movies and the father doesn't play Lesure Suit Larry if his kids are around. So you're comment is not shared by everyone.
this is total spam and will turn into flaming central. Closerize this!
This is a discussion on wheather or not the current rating system is working to protect younger kids from getting their hands on things that are not appropiate. We don't have flaming now and the cold truth is you're the only person that really has posted any spam as of yet in this thread.
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too

I am a geek.
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Post by bicostp »

The problem lies mostly in the parents. From what I have seen, they will buy anything for their kids if they whine, cry, and Finster about it for long enough, just to pacify them so they can hear their cell phone conversations. (OK so amybe not the phone part, but the first part is true.) They don't care who the game is geared for, all they care about is "if I buy this for the kid they'll shut up and be happy". Really this is wrong. I acted out in the store like that once. ONCE. My mom left the cart at the customer service desk, brought me out to the car, and I got SUCH a yelling-at! :lol: I wasn't allowed to go to the store for a couple months! And keep in mind I as 2 or so...

I think parents are afraid to dicipline their kids today or something...
dman762000
Posts: 451
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 6:55 pm
Location: jonesboro ar

Post by dman762000 »

I have an idea that will fix the whole problem. Just do away with ratings systems alltogether and when parents come up whining " little jonny played grand theft auto for 72 hours straight then went to the mall and killed a dozen people, I wanna sue the company" we lock the parents up for 72 years for being bad parents and buying jonny a game without doing the reasearch on the game first and letting the kid be obsessive about it. Geesh make your kids go out and play in the sun once in a while. Sit down and have a meal as a family, do anything to be involved in the kids life instead of expecting a 200 dollar piece of technology to be a babysitter for you so you don't have to deal with them.

p.s. sorry for the rant
demonofaj
Portablizer Extraordinaire
Posts: 2553
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:52 pm
PSN Username: ajsen1gma
Steam ID: demonofaj
Location: NYC (718)
Contact:

Post by demonofaj »

Gamer2, you haven't met my mom...believe me....I wanted to buy the Warriors (movie), and she first borrowed it from a friend, watched it herself and regulated the 'safeness' of it.....since only like 2 f-words, I could see it, through stern talking.

In game, she takes the thing and reads the rating, and then the back, and she always sees the back if a ESRB lettter is missing....*sigh* so close to GTA, yet so far (I haven't/never played GTA cept the first one....)
"Life's a female of the dog species, then you die.."
Mr. Hawkins
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:32 pm
Location: Way down South

Post by Mr. Hawkins »

How about this :lol: That should get their attention

Image
It's not about quantity, but rather quality
Image
Image
gamefunatic
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: i'll give you a hint: i can see you
Contact:

Post by gamefunatic »

sam fisher wrote:Well in my experiance, well over here in Britain, noone cares about ERSP or BBFC, the major classification over here, ratings. Also I wasnt trying to be opinionated and I think you better look up contradiction because I dont see how I need a sense of contradiction to comment on someones idea. So could you please stop trying to tell me off for things? Also If you spent a bit of time on the image you could have done a bit better than that. Also he wanted peoples opinions. I gave him mine. Might help in america, I dont know, but noone bothers with the ratings over here.

Also he said he has sent the results to ERSP. Well they are not going to care what 20 people think compared to over 100 million. So sample size is extremely relevent! Now you please back off Skyone.
you said you weren't opinonated and then you said you had an opinion... how does that work out?
EDIT:
do you know what? i take that back because i don't want to get invovled
i'm lazy...so what?
sam fisher
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:52 am

Post by sam fisher »

I said i was trying not to be opinionated.
Image
Post Reply