Game maker for mac
Moderator: Moderators
-
joevennix
- Portablizer
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:34 am
- Location: On permanent vacation from reality.
Make it stop! How long will this go on...
I use a Mac, and I think that macs have their advantages, including security, great graphic design programs, not freezing too often, etc. However, PC's also have their areas of expertise, i.e. compatibility, programming, GAMING, etc. Hell, I bought a PC just for gaming. It's just ridiculous to fight over them.
Now, back to the question:
Coldstone for 3D RPG's.
The Green Machine X for 2D side-scrollers.
What a great 100th post, huh.
I use a Mac, and I think that macs have their advantages, including security, great graphic design programs, not freezing too often, etc. However, PC's also have their areas of expertise, i.e. compatibility, programming, GAMING, etc. Hell, I bought a PC just for gaming. It's just ridiculous to fight over them.
Now, back to the question:
Coldstone for 3D RPG's.
The Green Machine X for 2D side-scrollers.
What a great 100th post, huh.
I don't know about game programming specificly, but I can tell you that in the *nix world there are more programming utilties then Windows could ever offer. If you know how to program in the first place you should be able to write a game, only downside is that you'll be working from the ground up.
As for the debate of Mac OS over Windows. Classic OS vs. 9x(and ME) OS wins. Simply because it crashed less and had far superior power in both graphics and responce speed. OS X vs. NT based OS X wins, as it has better security and protected memory (means no BSOD or reboots).
As for the debate of Mac OS over Windows. Classic OS vs. 9x(and ME) OS wins. Simply because it crashed less and had far superior power in both graphics and responce speed. OS X vs. NT based OS X wins, as it has better security and protected memory (means no BSOD or reboots).
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too
I am a geek.
-
Black Six
- Moderator
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:34 pm
- 360 GamerTag: Black 5ix
- Location: MD
Just have to add my $0.02 here, because I can't stand people uneducated on the subject mindlessly bashing a platform. Those of you bashing Macs, have you ever used one for more than two seconds? Do me a favor, before you complain about how something sucks, gain some experience so you can have a legitimate reason before complaining about it.
Personally, I prefer Macs. I have to use both Macs and PCs daily, and have for many years. During that time I've had problems with both platforms. From my experience, these happen a lot more on Windows and to a higher degree of severity. The interface is a lot less user friendly, and things that are intuitive on a Mac can take a lot longer on a PC.
See, based on my own observations and experiences, I feel Macs are better. If you're going to keep posting your uneducated trash on these boards, you'll lose all my respect, and also based on past experiences, I feel many other members will agree with that.
Personally, I prefer Macs. I have to use both Macs and PCs daily, and have for many years. During that time I've had problems with both platforms. From my experience, these happen a lot more on Windows and to a higher degree of severity. The interface is a lot less user friendly, and things that are intuitive on a Mac can take a lot longer on a PC.
See, based on my own observations and experiences, I feel Macs are better. If you're going to keep posting your uneducated trash on these boards, you'll lose all my respect, and also based on past experiences, I feel many other members will agree with that.
"It's not that life's so short, it's just that you're dead for so long." -Anonymous
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
Calm down.Black Six wrote:Just have to add my $0.02 here, because I can't stand people uneducated on the subject mindlessly bashing a platform. Those of you bashing Macs, have you ever used one for more than two seconds? Do me a favor, before you complain about how something sucks, gain some experience so you can have a legitimate reason before complaining about it.
Personally, I prefer Macs. I have to use both Macs and PCs daily, and have for many years. During that time I've had problems with both platforms. From my experience, these happen a lot more on Windows and to a higher degree of severity. The interface is a lot less user friendly, and things that are intuitive on a Mac can take a lot longer on a PC.
See, based on my own observations and experiences, I feel Macs are better. If you're going to keep posting your uneducated trash on these boards, you'll lose all my respect, and also based on past experiences, I feel many other members will agree with that.
I use both Macs (at school) and PCs (at home).
Macs:
Pros:
Not too many viruses
Apple handles them (in support) very well [unlike iPods...]
Awesome looking layout
Good for graphics desgining
Handles physcial memory well
Good sercurity
Cons:
Horrible gaming
Not available for open source development (or atleast, too much...)
Few programs
Non-upgradable in; hardware
and software
Small amount of customization
Isolated from many PC based products
Not as supported as Windows/MS
Hard to use mouse!
You can get up to 2.0GHz Dual Processor/2.2GHz Single Proccessor

Windows [XP]/PC
Pros:
Upgradable in; hardware
and software
Ability to dual boot OS's easily
Ability to overclock
Good UI
Very customizable in look
Great gaming possibilities
Tons of programs
Easy to develop for software
and hardware
Doesn't take up an unbearable amount of space on HDDs
Easy to administer
Easy to link together/lan
More saftey [in SP2]
Easier internet
Good file extensions
Easy interface/accessability
Good customer support
We can get up to 3.4GHz Dual Processor/3.8GHz Single Proccessor
Cons:
Internet Explorer sucks
More viruses
Handles physical memory and processor worse than mac.
So there.
I pick Windows over Mac any day.
Now you can't parade around saying I haven't my thoughts straight.
And it's our opinions, BASED on facts.
So do ME a favor; if you're going to lose respect for anyone, get their side of the story first.
-
joevennix
- Portablizer
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:34 am
- Location: On permanent vacation from reality.
Actually, you would be surprised at how much software Mac has: more than most people think. It is very lacking in the games department, but as for other software, there is no shortage!
What's wrong with the mouses? (mice?)
As for Internet Explorer sucking: you're not alone. Safari makes me tear m hair out sometimes. Something Apple definitely needs to work on. I guess that's what Firefox is there for.
At least this topic's calmed down a bit...
What's wrong with the mouses? (mice?)
As for Internet Explorer sucking: you're not alone. Safari makes me tear m hair out sometimes. Something Apple definitely needs to work on. I guess that's what Firefox is there for.
At least this topic's calmed down a bit...
-
bicostp
- Moderator
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
- Steam ID: bicostp
- Location: Spamalot
- Contact:
Don't tell me you believe the Megahertz Myth!Skyone wrote:You can get up to 2.0GHz Dual Processor/2.2GHz Single Proccessor [rolling laughing smiley]
The PowerPC architecture (G5, G4, G3, 604e, 604, 603e, 603, 601) only requires 7 clock cycles to perform one operation. The x86 systems (Pentium *, Celeron...) require roughly 3 times that number, so they actually have to have a higher clock speed to perform the same operations. Besides, unless I am misstaken, AMD Athlon 64 processors run the same clock speeds as G5s do, and everyone says they're lightning fast... So a 2.0 ghz G5 is the rough equivelant of a 3.6 or 4.0 ghz Pentium 4. (maybe more)
No arguments here!Internet Explorer sucks
EDIT: Oh yeah, OSX takes up some space, but with Service Pack 2 and all current updates, Windows XP takes up about 4 and a half GIGABYTES of space!
Last edited by bicostp on Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Twitter
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
-
Black Six
- Moderator
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:34 pm
- 360 GamerTag: Black 5ix
- Location: MD
Some of what you say I agree with, other stuff I find completely off-base.
There's plenty of Open-Source dev for Mac, just go to sourceforge and look around. Just about anything written in C or Java or Python or a bunch of other languages can be cross-compiled with the change of a few libraries, a lot of the code is the same. Stuff like Opeg-GL is fully supported, meaning it works just as well. If you think about it, a lot of Open Source apps are where Linux and Unix, OS X is based on Unix, so it's really easy to get them to compile on a Mac.Skyone wrote:Calm down.
I use both Macs (at school) and PCs (at home).
Macs:
Pros:
Not too many viruses
Apple handles them (in support) very well [unlike iPods...]
Awesome looking layout
Good for graphics desgining
Handles physcial memory well
Good sercurity
Cons:
Horrible gaming
Not available for open source development (or atleast, too much...)
As joevennix said, as long as you're not talking games, there's plenty of good software out for the Mac.Few programs
Non-upgradable in; hardware
and software
Well if you're stuck using a school computer with an Apple Mouse, I agree; however, if you own the Mac, nothing is stopping you from buying a 3-button scroll wheel mouse, plugging it right in, and having everything work perfectly.Small amount of customization
Isolated from many PC based products
Not as supported as Windows/MS
Hard to use mouse!
Excuse me? Try two dual-core 2.5 GHz processors.You can get up to 2.0GHz Dual Processor/2.2GHz Single Proccessor
This is more a matter of opinion, personally, I think OS X's UI is better.Windows [XP]/PC
Pros:
Upgradable in; hardware
and software
Ability to dual boot OS's easily
Ability to overclock
Good UI
Like I said, the same can be said about MacsVery customizable in look
Great gaming possibilities
Tons of programs
Easy to develop for software
and hardware
I don't remember exactly how much space each OS takes up on a HD, but I know they're both fairly large, and probably more or less equal.Doesn't take up an unbearable amount of space on HDDs
Just as easy on a Mac, even if you're linking Macs with PCsEasy to administer
Easy to link together/lan
More safety than earlier versions of Windows, but not safer than a Mac.More saftey [in SP2]
I'm not sure what these two are. It's just as easy to get a Mac on the internet, and both platforms use a lot of the same file extensions, so this is null in my opinion.Easier internet
Good file extensions
This is the same as your UI comment, just a matter of opinion.Easy interface/accessability
Well, while I still don't agree with everything you have to say, I will offer my apologies, but my earlier post was aimed primarily at Kurt_, who was saying much more derogatory things about Macs.Good customer support
We can get up to 3.4GHz Dual Processor/3.8GHz Single Proccessor
Cons:
Internet Explorer sucks
More viruses
Handles physical memory and processor worse than mac.
So there.
I pick Windows over Mac any day.
Now you can't parade around saying I haven't my thoughts straight.
And it's our opinions, BASED on facts.
So do ME a favor; if you're going to lose respect for anyone, get their side of the story first.
"It's not that life's so short, it's just that you're dead for so long." -Anonymous
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
