Holy poop?

khaag · Post by **khaag** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 3:04 am

http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/24/onli ... sole-star/

attacknick · Post by **attacknick** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:15 am

hot dog!

Twilight Wolf · Post by **Twilight Wolf** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:19 am

Maybe this means I can finally play a version of "Team Fortress 2" that has regular maintenance!

HotDog-Cart · Post by **HotDog-Cart** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:26 am

attacknick wrote:hot dog!

Yes? What do you want?

Post by **eagle5953** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:16 am

What?

The Phantom realized?

jleemero · Post by **jleemero** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:19 am

eagle5953 wrote:What?

The Phantom realized?

Hardly

Post by **eagle5953** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:34 am

Not for nothing, I would love to put a PC or perhaps an XBox into the case they initially had planned for it.

I don't think they ever physically produced this prototype case, but it could probably be approximated.

jleemero · Post by **jleemero** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:41 am

I've never actually seen that one, the only case I've seen was this:

Post by **eagle5953** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:45 am

Yeah, I've seen that one too. Didn't like it nearly as much as the computer-rendered one.

But doesn't this story sound like that at all? Look at the back of that picture:
"Broadband Receiver with Integrated On-Demand Game Delivery Service"

Sounds very similar to me.

XCVG · Post by **XCVG** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:56 am

Meh, sounds like crap. I'd rather have the game running on my computer. I get internet lag just PLAYING, imagine the kind of lag with this. Takes 2 seconds to go from mouse movement to character movement.

jleemero · Post by **jleemero** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:31 am

eagle5953 wrote:Yeah, I've seen that one too. Didn't like it nearly as much as the computer-rendered one.

But doesn't this story sound like that at all? Look at the back of that picture:
"Broadband Receiver with Integrated On-Demand Game Delivery Service"

Sounds very similar to me.

Kinda, I suppose.

Completely different concept though

Post by **bicostp** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:07 pm

jleemero wrote:I've never actually seen that one, the only case I've seen was this:

Looks like something from Portal.

, Aperture Science Computer Audio-Visual Stimulation Device

Post by **eagle5953** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 2:16 pm

bicostp wrote:
jleemero wrote:I've never actually seen that one, the only case I've seen was this:

Looks like something from Portal.

, Aperture Science Computer Audio-Visual Stimulation Device

It totally does!

samjc3 · Post by **samjc3** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:43 pm

bicostp wrote:Aperture Science Computer Audio-Visual Stimulation Device

you could use it with your best friend companion cube, but you cant, because you killed him

Post by **bicostp** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:55 pm

Actually, the Weighted Companion Cube doesn't actually get eliminated. "Kill" the cube, and then go back to the beginning of that level. The "incinerator" just drops the WCC into the tube from whence it came. If Valve really wanted you to "kill" the WCC, the incinerator would remove it from the level as if you threw it through the particle field.

Wait...

samjc3 wrote:
bicostp wrote:Aperture Science Computer Audio-Visual Stimulation Device
you could use it with your best friend companion cube, but you cant, because you killed him

I see what you did there.

benheck.com Forums

Holy poop?

Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?

Re: Holy poop?