Vista rates my HDD as 4.6, but Windows 7 rate it as a 2.
Windows 7 Public Beta
Moderator: Moderators
Wanna bet I can do waaay worse than that? I post my results in a bit.bicostp wrote:
: Running 3DMark Vantage (the trial version that's locked on Performance.). It rendered a total of 167 frames in the Jane Nash demo.
EDIT 2: Holy. Crap. I think I just set a new standard for suckiness.
P748 3DMarks
http://service.futuremark.com/home.acti ... ultType=19
EDIT: 2,432 3DMarks in 3DMark 06.
Time for a new compy. But I guess it goes to show you that anything, even a relatively junk PC with bad components, can run Windows 7.
I still can't run the performance thing though. It always freezes at the media part.
-
nightwheel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:49 am
- PSN Username: nightwheel
- 360 GamerTag: nightwheel94
- Steam ID: nightwheel
- Location: Kentucky, We are KFC
- Contact:
The Windows 7 installer so far HATES my computer. I tried both the 64-bit and 32-bit version. And so far, I keep into running into the same glitch. I even used non USB keyboard and mouse, removed my (useless) Dial Up Modem, and unplugged my USB Wifi adapter. But still had the same problem.
I'm going to try again tonight to install. But this time, I'm hooking my computer up directly to the internet cable. And see if it's a problem related to getting updates while install.
I'm going to try again tonight to install. But this time, I'm hooking my computer up directly to the internet cable. And see if it's a problem related to getting updates while install.
-
xtrmgam3r360
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:24 am
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
-
benheck
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- Location: Wisconsin - Land of Beer and Cheese and Beer
- Contact:
Ah, interesting Aguilz. My laptop's fan also runs WAY too much on Vista. My old laptop would only run the fan when it did something "tough", new one thinks "oh, I've on wall power, time to GO FOR IT!"
Less fan would be a good improvement.
That said, I still think [7] is probably just Vista SP2, really. Keep in mind XP was just 2000 reskinned and with better plug & play.
I don't see what people have against their system using RAM. That's what it's there for, and is faster than a swap file.
-Ben
Less fan would be a good improvement.
That said, I still think [7] is probably just Vista SP2, really. Keep in mind XP was just 2000 reskinned and with better plug & play.
I don't see what people have against their system using RAM. That's what it's there for, and is faster than a swap file.
-Ben

Did you run windows update yet? It got the sound drivers for me automatically when I ran it. (Soundblaster)xtrmgam3r360 wrote:Agreed, and not just Vista, it runs faster on my computer than XP!Aguiluz wrote:I love Windows 7, no doubt, and will be buying the full retail OEM version for my laptop.
Better than Vista, hands down.
BTW: does anyone know where to get Soundblaster drivers that work in 7?
-
nightwheel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:49 am
- PSN Username: nightwheel
- 360 GamerTag: nightwheel94
- Steam ID: nightwheel
- Location: Kentucky, We are KFC
- Contact:
Game compatibility is fine. I haven't run into a single error in WoW or any of my 35 Steam Games.Kurt_ wrote:So is this like a ME vs 2000 thing? Vista vs. 7?
Also, how's game compatibility? Is it like Vista? or more like XP, where it can actually run games?
And with the beta, I don't suppose those who have beta can get the full version for free?
Btw, my Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS had drivers installed after the first Windows Update.

