If its not to ugly or intrustive I think its a good idea.nos_slived wrote:I think the site should have this.
How to put images in your posts
Moderator: Moderators
-
Joes2Silly
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:19 pm
- Location: SA, TX
- Contact:
-
Joes2Silly
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:19 pm
- Location: SA, TX
- Contact:
What are you typing into the field? It should be
Code: Select all
[img]blahblahlbah.com/blah[/img]
or
<img src="blahblahblah.com/blah" /><a href="http://profile.mygamercard.net/soundwave348">
<img src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gel/soundwave348.png">
</a>
<img src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gel/soundwave348.png">
</a>
-
Joes2Silly
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:19 pm
- Location: SA, TX
- Contact:
By link do you mean
?
Because those are the wrong ways.
Code: Select all
<a href="blahblahblah.com/blah">...</a>
or
[url]blahblahblah.com/blah[/url]Because those are the wrong ways.
<a href="http://profile.mygamercard.net/soundwave348">
<img src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gel/soundwave348.png">
</a>
<img src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gel/soundwave348.png">
</a>
-
Joes2Silly
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:19 pm
- Location: SA, TX
- Contact:
-
nos_slived
- Higher Idiot
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
He just put:
You need to put:
I don't know if anybody else still likes the idea, but I do.
Code: Select all
http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/3954/ninlogo5er.gifCode: Select all
[img]http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/3954/ninlogo5er.gif[/img]I just thought about that again, and we really should have it. I took a look at it, and it is small. It gets placed just above the "Disable HTML in this post" checkbox, if you follow their directions, but you can stick it anywhere if you find the right spot in the code. It is also completely customizable if you know what you're doing(really simple to do). It also loads the link page in a new window, so you don't lose anything that you've already typed. If we agreed on where to put it, and what to make it look like, I could write a small how-to, and change the code, then give it to Ben and ask him to do it when he has some spare time(10 minutes worth).HK-47 wrote:If its not to ugly or intrustive I think its a good idea.nos_slived wrote:I think the site should have this.
I don't know if anybody else still likes the idea, but I do.
Last edited by nos_slived on Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

-
Joes2Silly
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:19 pm
- Location: SA, TX
- Contact:
-
nos_slived
- Higher Idiot
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
-
nos_slived
- Higher Idiot
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
-
bicostp
- Moderator
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
- Steam ID: bicostp
- Location: Spamalot
- Contact:
I agree. We should have the imageshack thing installed. It's non-intrusive and it's a simple copy-and-paste installation to an HTML file. (from what I can tell)
Twitter
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
-
nos_slived
- Higher Idiot
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Nope. It's free.
I'm almost done working on the sample page. It looks pretty good in Firefox, I just need to move something, but it makes the page clean, because the box remains hidden until you click "Show the ImageShack box". I still have to work some stuff out for Internet Explorer, and I need to find somebody with Netscape to try it(not until I get it working properly in IE and FF though). I'm also trying to decide whether to leave it as I have it now(a script link in the options panel, above "HTML is ON"), or if I should make a new checkbox above "Disable HTML in this post" to show the ImageShack box.
I just looked over the file that you add to, and I think I am going to use the checkbox(for simplicity, and because it looks better).
I'm almost done working on the sample page. It looks pretty good in Firefox, I just need to move something, but it makes the page clean, because the box remains hidden until you click "Show the ImageShack box". I still have to work some stuff out for Internet Explorer, and I need to find somebody with Netscape to try it(not until I get it working properly in IE and FF though). I'm also trying to decide whether to leave it as I have it now(a script link in the options panel, above "HTML is ON"), or if I should make a new checkbox above "Disable HTML in this post" to show the ImageShack box.
I just looked over the file that you add to, and I think I am going to use the checkbox(for simplicity, and because it looks better).

