Oakley 3D glasses

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
budnespid
Posts: 388
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: South, Deep Deep down South

Re: Oakley 3D glasses

Post by budnespid »

I tested a samsung 3D/2D television.
Both were amazing. I just have no interest until they dont require glasses.
jdmlight
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 11:17 pm
Steam ID: jdmlight
Location: A boring suburb of Chicago.

Re: Oakley 3D glasses

Post by jdmlight »

Raizer04 wrote:Just as the writer said in the article (http://gizmodo.com/5675528/oakleys-3d-g ... ron-legacy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) Im sick of all this 3d crap....it doesnt even look that good to me....and i wish it would just go away....LED TVs are the good stuff in my opinon.
I'm sick of 3D as well. It doesn't really add much to a movie, and it usually ends up taking away from the movie as it's often done poorly. Depth of field on nice video cameras keeps you looking at what the director wants you to stay focused on, really-well-done-3D just will let you look at everything all at once, taking away from the goal of the scene.
[/rant]
I'd totally agree that LED TVs are the good stuff. (I work at Target, sometimes in electronics) It's refreshing for once to have a new technology where the husband walks in trying to be all "so, spec-spec-spec-spec. that's the good stuff right?" Then the wife says "That one looks the best to me." The husband asks me which one is the best one we sell, and I say "The Samsung LED-backlit LCD TV your wife pointed out." (side rant, they are NOT LED TVs, that's just the backlight, they're still LCDs...)

(not trying to be sexist, this has happened to me multiple times)
--John (and please call me John, it's really weird to be called by my username)
Fight MS Paint abominations! If you don't have a camera, go here, and pick something 3 megapixels or higher.
Post Reply