joeyjoe9876 wrote:lol just so you can tell the difference when spotting spammer, just look at there signature and if it is promoting an item or linking to some site to buy something that it is a spammer. but yes if OLED's were cheaper i would use them as they look rediculously thinTchay wrote:I totally agree with you dude (welcome to the forums btw). But it will be a while before people on this forum take OLED seriously.perambulator wrote:OLED is definitely the future of monitors and TVs. When Sony announced their 11 inch OLED screen in 2007 I laughed and perceived it to be yet another cool product with high Sony tax added to the price. But when I got to see it in the flesh on my vacation in New York earlier this year, I was completely stunned by the sight of the TV. If you're impressed by the colour reproduction of Kuro plasma screens then the first OLED screen you'll see will knowck you to the floor. Contrast, brightness and vivdness was astonisgly immaculate and trumps anything I've ever seen.
The experience was very relaxing for the eyes too as they didn't have to strain themselves to distinguish similar colours from one another. I work a lot with editing tools like photoshop and would highly benefit from an OLED TV or monitor though it will be another 1-2 years before mass production commence. But nontheless OLED has the upperhand when it comes to image quality and colour reproduction.
______________________________________________________________________
Snoozer pet car seat | printers bellevue
No arguments please, just stick with the topic.
yeah I feel like a complete idiot
I just took sides with a spam bot....
