Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Re: Pandora Console?

Post by bicostp »

Split.

EDIT: WTF?! I told it to split a bunch of posts and it screws itself all up?!

EDIT 2: Fixed.
samjc3
Posts: 1086
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:05 pm
Steam ID: samjc3
Location: burning and pillaging!!

Re: Pandora Console?

Post by samjc3 »

bicostp wrote:Split.

EDIT: WTF?! I told it to split a bunch of posts and it screws itself all up?!

EDIT 2: Fixed.
good job. lovely split.


actually, it would be kind of cool if only 400 pandoras were released, because i will have money and preorder two, then they will end up being worth a lot, because there wont really be any out there.
AfroLH wrote:
HotDog-Cart wrote: Also, the codename stuff adds a little bit of sexyness, in my eyes.
Yeah well Alcohol adds a little bit of sexyness in my eyes, but I dont drink it all the time. :wink:
SpongeBuell wrote:As proof, I offer this picture of a monkey on my head.
jjhammerstein
Senior Member
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:15 pm
Location: Southern CT
Contact:

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by jjhammerstein »

.........unless they totally bomb and become worthless. :P
GET FREE WOW GOLD SEX VISIT MODRETRO

palmertech
Senior Member
Posts: 3225
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies

Re: Pandora Console?

Post by palmertech »

samjc3 wrote: because i will have money and preorder two
Have you already preordered? The first 4000 are already ordered.
Image

Excellent
XCVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by XCVG »

jjhammerstein wrote:.........unless they totally bomb and become worthless. :P
.......which they will because nobody will develop anything for a 400-person userbase.
palmertech wrote:
samjc3 wrote: because i will have money and preorder two
Have you already preordered? The first 4000 are already ordered.
Wow. Are they even going to make that many?


In any case, why can't anyone agree on a standard? PCs have been x86 with one main OS (like it or not, most people use Windows, which is THE STANDARD) for years. Why, WHY, WHY can't we do that with a handheld too?
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by bicostp »

Because the system-on-a-chip they're using is cheap and easy to build off of.

ARM dominates the embedded market almost as much as x86 holds the desktop/server market. (Actually I think ARM's biggest competition comes from the Zilog z80.) The main thing is power consumption. ARM CPUs use almost no power. The problem is they have very weak computational power compared to x86.
palmertech
Senior Member
Posts: 3225
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by palmertech »

Yes, they are making that many.

Because X86 generates too much heat, and eats too much power. No matter what you do, you have that problem. There is just no way around it; I say the ARM revolution is coming, and I am glad. The Pandora gets 10 hours at FULL CPU POWER, while 700mhz MIDs with X86 are lucky to get 2.
Image

Excellent
tom61
Senior Member
Posts: 1517
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 6:51 pm

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by tom61 »

bicostp wrote: (Actually I think ARM's biggest competition comes from the Zilog z80.)
The main competitor of ARM is MIPS. MIPS processors power the PSP ( and PSX and PS2), consumer internet routers, netbooks that don't run x86 or ARM (not many of these yet, but they are cheap and look to be a big trend in developing nations and China) and many more embedded devices.
XCVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by XCVG »

palmertech wrote:Because X86 generates too much heat.
*facepalm*

That's like saying all trucks are crap, or all LCD monitors have huge color issues. x86 processors CAN be small, power efficient, and low power. The problem is that nobody has bothered to make a cool, low-power processor. Maybe VIA will step up to this plate? Maybe AMD? Intel has tried and failed.

Don't blame the architecture for the chip makers' shortcomings.

As I have said and said and said and said and said again, x86 is the universal standard. Wouldn't it be nice to have something that I could, like, you know, install normal apps on? The userbase is absolutely massive, so there's a plethora of apps.

And even ARM powered devices have no standardization among them. It wouldn't be so bad if I could run DS apps on a GP2X or Pandora.
bicostp wrote:(Actually I think ARM's biggest competition comes from the Zilog z80.)
The Z80 is an old outdated piece of crap that dates back to the 1980s. No way.
tom61 wrote:The main competitor of ARM is MIPS. MIPS processors power the PSP ( and PSX and PS2), consumer internet routers, netbooks that don't run x86 or ARM (not many of these yet, but they are cheap and look to be a big trend in developing nations and China) and many more embedded devices.
MIPS is pretty much a dead architecture. ARM is about 90% of the way to completely killing it. And hopefully x86 will kill ARM. Then we will live in a happy world where software is completely intercompatible with everything. Yeah, like that's ever going to happen. When will someone step up to the plate of making low power x86 devices? I guess it just doesn't have the allure (?) of making ultra-fast chips.

In any case, standard standard standard. There's a reason I'm an insane PC fanboy.
palmertech
Senior Member
Posts: 3225
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by palmertech »

XCVG wrote: x86 processors CAN be small, power efficient, and low power. The problem is that nobody has bothered to make a cool, low-power processor.
Actually, I am blaming the architecture. It is simply not made in such a way that you can scale down the heat and power drain; The only thing keeping X86 alive is it's huge userbase, it is an antiquated POS dating back to the 80's. :wink:

Via HAS made low power X86 CPUs. But guess what? Even those ULV Via chips at a mere 600mhz eat battery life faster than Oprah eats carbs. I really do wish there was a way, but face it: X86 is going to die. Not for a long time, of course; But the second that ARM gets to the point where we can emulate legacy apps of today, it will happen. Right now, ARM tops out at mid to high end 486 emulation, but it can only get better from here. Or maybe I am wrong, and ARM is destined to be merely a handheld and low power computer solution.

The point is, you can do all you want to make X86 smaller, power sipping, and low heat, but it will simply not happen. And if you DID: Guess what? By then, ARM will have advanced to be 5 times as powerful for the same power use, anyways! :lol:

Also, ARM is coming together as a compatible platform. There is no reason you cannot run DS games on a Pandora, except for the fact that no source code exists. Right now, the standard for ARM is .DEB packages, and the Ubuntu ARM repo has almost any piece of software available for normal linux.

Conclusion: I want a small X86 power computer as much as you. But it is simply not practical for everyday use.
Image

Excellent
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by bicostp »

But by that point, x86 will have further progressed, so ARM would still be behind.

And guess what? ARM is ALSO "an antiquated POS dating back to the 80's", having been introduced in '83. :P
AfroLH
Posts: 725
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:31 pm
Location: Down da Baya

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by AfroLH »

Dude,
The Pandora is Just Straight up GANGSTA...
End of Argument.
XCVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1947
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:10 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by XCVG »

I think ARM is destined to either die or stay a low power platform. The problem is that the architecture is designed for low power, so it's not really scalable to full power PC.

Just as ARM has evolved, so has x86. The Atom is only the beginning. I hope. If not I'm gonna send some hatemail :twisted:

This could turn into a flame war so quickly. I'm going to try to keep my cool. Yeah, I'll probably run outside screaming and on fire.
ShockSlayer
Niblet 64
Posts: 5059
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:47 pm
Location: In my inbox.

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by ShockSlayer »

This isn't a flame war. This.....is....DEBATE!!!!!!! [/sparta]

SS
http://twitter.com/ShockSlayer" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
palmertech
Senior Member
Posts: 3225
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:40 am
Location: California, land of the homeless and hippies

Re: Handheld Gaming PC Things (Split)

Post by palmertech »

I think that the reall issue here is batteries. Rather than being upset about our differences, let us find common ground and rage about how battery tech has barely improved in 10 years. :twisted:

And there are +1ghz ARM chips, and they get a lot more done per cycle than X68, too. :wink: Call me crazy, I just like ARM for some reason. :mrgreen:

Oh, and another thing: While I do not think it will happen, a commercially OR homebrew Ion based MID with gaming controls would be heaven for me. :P
Image

Excellent
Post Reply