Is one snoac better than the other? Should I get the retro duo or the fc twin?
thanks.
edit:I plan to make a portable out of it.
a prefered snoac?
Moderator: Moderators
-
stuntpenguin007
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:21 pm
a prefered snoac?
SNESP WIP
Case - 50%
acquired parts - 90%
assembly - 0%
Case - 50%
acquired parts - 90%
assembly - 0%
-
themadhacker
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:53 pm
- Location: ohio
Re: a prefered snoac?
The retro duo is better. It is compatible with mario rpg. nuff said.
rest in peace, Ronnie James Dio! \m/
-
stuntpenguin007
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:21 pm
Re: a prefered snoac?
wow thanks, That saved me some frustration.
SNESP WIP
Case - 50%
acquired parts - 90%
assembly - 0%
Case - 50%
acquired parts - 90%
assembly - 0%
-
Triton
- Moderator
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
- 360 GamerTag: triton199
- Steam ID: triton199
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
Re: a prefered snoac?
retro duo: more compatible
FCtwin: smaller than retro duo
that about sums it up lol
FCtwin: smaller than retro duo
that about sums it up lol
Visit us at Portablesofdoom.org
-
stuntpenguin007
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:21 pm
Re: a prefered snoac?
well I would take compatability over a little bit of size. anyways I ordered one (ouch, that hurt my wallet
)
SNESP WIP
Case - 50%
acquired parts - 90%
assembly - 0%
Case - 50%
acquired parts - 90%
assembly - 0%
-
footinmouth
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:42 am
- Location: CANADA
Re: a prefered snoac?
is the nes board smaller than the nes board on a yobo fc?Triton wrote:retro duo: more compatible
FCtwin: smaller than retro duo
that about sums it up lol
i hate how electronic part suppliers give you an option on their website to filter your searches so that you can find a certain part and no results come up!