Twilight Wolf wrote:The fact that they're catering exclusively to the much larger "casual gamer" market shows me that they're, more or less, only in it for the money now.
they really gave no choice.

Look at the gamecube, it had a lot of the "hardcore" Nintendo games, and it more or less failed. If I were running Nintendo, I would stick with the money as well; What else would they do, only make core Nintendo games that do not make as much money? They saw their shot to be the "kids console" of the next gen, and they are winning it. At least this strategy, while painful for a while, is probably just a recovery cycle phase; They are actually doing what it takes to keep Nintendo going. If you want to see why Sony and Microsoft are being stubborn, you only need to look at the fall of comic books. As time went on, the industry kept moving WITH the audience, making comics more complex/more mature. Problem is, once those people hit a certain age, they stop buying comics.
Same deal with games: As time goes on, the Xbox and the playstation are just moving with their core audience in terms of age range. What happens when those 20-somethings are in their 40s and have a real career? Nintendo, on the other hand, is using simple titles to lure in the youngest gamers, AND the ones who will play only simple games, regardless of age (See: Most soccer moms). Sure, this will suck for a while, but I see Nintendo winning the NEXT gen, due to Sony and M$ losing customers fast, and Nintendo having bred a whole new army of fanboys. Just gotta hang in there.
An interesting note: Hiroshi Yamauchi, who was president of Nintendo for 53 years until 2002, claims to have never played a videogame, yet he has led Nintendo to all sorts of great games/franchises. Then, Satoru Iwata, who claims te be a "true" gamer, comes in and makes THIS happen. Some crazy sort of irony there, eh?
