Digital television.

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

Jongamer
Senior Member
Posts: 2151
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:43 pm
PSN Username: Geekystig790
360 GamerTag: Mesu Gitsune
Location: Fairborn, Ohio

Re: Digital television.

Post by Jongamer »

I like my Digital Cable. Even though I only watch like maybe a handful of channels on the Digital band of Channels.

Roadrunner Turbo awesome internet speed (although Upload speeds suck, I can get up past 1.5MB/s Download speed) and the Digital phones are just as good as phone lines. Caller ID on the TV FTW.

We have Comcast around here, but Comcast is too damn expensive from what I hear, so I use Time Warner.
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Re: Digital television.

Post by bicostp »

Jongamer wrote:Comcast is too damn expensive

YES THEY ARE.

Sucks when they're the only choice. Hurry up and install your fiber-optic lines, Verizon! :cry:
Black Six
Moderator
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:34 pm
360 GamerTag: Black 5ix
Location: MD

Re: Digital television.

Post by Black Six »

I watched the entire Super Bowl on an antenna on Digital TV and it looked amazing. But it definitely takes some adjustment and while some channels come in great, others don't fare so well. It's all about finding the right spot, and amplifiers can help too (my antenna has a built in one).
"It's not that life's so short, it's just that you're dead for so long." -Anonymous
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
jleemero
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:12 pm
Location: Yay Desert.

Re: Digital television.

Post by jleemero »

bicostp wrote:
Jongamer wrote:Comcast is too damn expensive
YES THEY ARE.

Sucks when they're the only choice. Hurry up and install your fiber-optic lines, Verizon! :cry:
Same exact problem.
I do have Comcast, and I must say, they are FAST.
On a normal day I'll pull ~9mbit down, 1mbit up.

The BEST I've ever tested was right after an outage ended (less than 5 minutes after it ended), pulled 24mbit down, 12 up.
More than we even pay for :P
Shame I don't get that on a normal day...

I HATE how Comcast likes to slow down my torrents... Actually, downloading I usually pull *about* full speed.
But uploading, I rarely break 25kbits. :x


No Verizon FIOS here :(
cowsgoquack101
Senior Member
Posts: 1981
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:21 am
Steam ID: cowsgoquack101
Location: Cold, grey Indiana!

Re: Digital television.

Post by cowsgoquack101 »

Well, at my house my over the air is just ass. I'm still pissed that our local fox station doesn't offer it after EVERY other station has had it for over at least a year. We used our 37" LCD to watch the superbowl and the audio went out for a little bit at a time (1-3 seconds) but when the game came on it was perfect. But I tried to watch it on the analog OTA broadcast and it looked terrible and sounded fuzzy. I say that the switch is an ok thing albeit the complete loss of analog broadcasts and the money needed to get a new converter box. Antiques Roadshow in high definition, yumm.
themadhacker
Senior Member
Posts: 2670
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: ohio

Re: Digital television.

Post by themadhacker »

I can't stand digital at all. I mean we have been using alalog since the late 1940's. Nothing is wrong with analog, so why change it now?

The only good outcome from digital conversion I can see is the fact that since pocket TVs use alalog, they will be unusable, and people will be getting rid of them for really cheap. That means a bunch of inexpensive screens for portables.
rest in peace, Ronnie James Dio! \m/
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Re: Digital television.

Post by bicostp »

themadhacker wrote:why change it now?
Because analog TV signals use a crapton of low frequency RF bandwidth, which takes less power to transmit further. Freeing up the VHF band will allow for better emergency communications and better wireless services (cell reception, 3G, etc). I read once that only half the number of cell towers would be needed to get the same coverage with a lower frequency when compared to the systems we have now.
ghosstt
Senior Member
Posts: 1551
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:14 pm

Re: Digital television.

Post by ghosstt »

Twilight Wolf wrote:Digital looks really nice when it's working absolutely perfectly, which is next to never. Analog was totally satisfactory to me.
Just give it a bit. They are probably working out a lot of things, and using a better antenna would help a lot.
Triton
Moderator
Posts: 7398
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
360 GamerTag: triton199
Steam ID: triton199
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Re: Digital television.

Post by Triton »

dish network/direct TV for the win, or FTA satellite even. cable sucks ass in quality overall compared to satellite and satellite is usually CHEAPER than cable for more channels. only thing i could wish for is a switch to ala carte channel selection instead of packages, and lower prices on HD options (12$ more a month for 12 HD channels is crap)
Jongamer
Senior Member
Posts: 2151
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:43 pm
PSN Username: Geekystig790
360 GamerTag: Mesu Gitsune
Location: Fairborn, Ohio

Re: Digital television.

Post by Jongamer »

Satellite does NOT have a better picture than Digital Cable. At least not on Standard Def TVs.
Triton
Moderator
Posts: 7398
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
360 GamerTag: triton199
Steam ID: triton199
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Re: Digital television.

Post by Triton »

Satellite does NOT have a better picture than Digital Cable. At least not on Standard Def TVs.
i would beg to differ. in my area anyway cable channels look TERRIBLE, visible compression artifacts on some channels even. looks even worse on HDTVs whereas my dish network always comes in crystal clear and id say comparable to DVD quality video on my 32" sanyo SDTV. of course i would assume it has to do with the cable carrier and whatnot and im sure in ottumwa IA its far from the best cable quality :lol:
Twilight Wolf
Posts: 848
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:46 pm
PSN Username: MySegaSaturn
Location: Reno

Re: Digital television.

Post by Twilight Wolf »

Well, guys, since yesterday (nearly two days now) was the old official switchover date, how many channels in your area are still broadcasting in analog? For me, it's two: CBS and NBC. Every other one switched over either on or before the 17th.
Image
Tchay wrote:
samjc3 wrote:Fire. Youve probably heard of it?
No he's from Canada.
Negative_Creep
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:04 pm
Location: New Crack City

Re: Digital television.

Post by Negative_Creep »

Still running on analog till like 2010.. haha.
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Re: Digital television.

Post by bicostp »

We used to get:
2 (PBS)
4 (CBS)
5 (ABC)
6 (ABC)
7 (NBC)
10 (NBC)
12 (CBS)
25 (FOX)
36 (PBS)
38 (Independent, owned by CBS)
44 (PBS)
56 (CW)
64 (FOX)
68 (home shopping)

Now, all we get is:
7
38
64 (but they're running a half-hour PSA about the digital switch in infinite loop)

At least with the new digital system we get even more channels over the air.

Fun fact: Channels 10 and 12 were so strong they made watching them on cable impossible. :lol: A paper clip jammed in the cable jack on the TV brought them in perfectly.

EDIT: Another thing I found: my DVD recorder has a digital tuner, and we get the over-the-air digital channels over the cable. We also get a few other things. Re-scanning the DTV channels brought up Noggin, Comedy Central On Demand, Comcast channel 1, some movie, and porn. :lol:
grossaffe
Posts: 1450
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:54 pm
Location: USA

Re: Digital television.

Post by grossaffe »

I haven't noticed a lack of channels
Post Reply