School help

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

teraflop122
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 9:06 pm

School help

Post by teraflop122 »

Don't worry, I'm not here to stay. Just popped in to look for more willing subjects to take my short sustainability survey. Results will be kept anonymous. Final essay to be read by the professor only.

1) Is the protection of endangered species a cause worthy of our (the human species) attention and resources? (yes/no)

2) China allows couples to have just one child, with few exceptions, as a method of population control. Would you welcome such a policy in your government? (yes/no)

Thank you, I appreciate it.

EDIT: Ive trashed question number 3. It was reduntant and presented an overly simplified theoretical world.
Last edited by teraflop122 on Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
grossaffe
Posts: 1450
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:54 pm
Location: USA

Post by grossaffe »

1) yes
2) no
3) B
CronoTriggerfan
Moderator
Posts: 4131
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Contact:

Post by CronoTriggerfan »

1. Yes
2. No
3. B
Image
bacteria
Portablizer Extraordinaire
Posts: 3984
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Hampshire, UK
Contact:

Post by bacteria »

"Yes" and "No" answers are only useful for a poll, not homework as such as I am sure you have to justify your comments and choices? (as you say, it is an "essay" after all).

So...

1) It was our strive to build civilizations and gather resources that put many species to being endangered in the first place. Worth saving an endangered species if they taste nice though. "Yes".

2) Such a policy is only enforceable in a totalitarian state ie a facist or communist state; not in the "free" world. The question is therefore academic as the countries where you have a choice, a government could not press for such a law and in countries you have no choice, you think as your government tells you to think...

3) If in your imaginary world "one half is covered by human development and the other by natural habitats" then there is no need to have a choice A or B as the state of separation already exists. If they have their half of the world, then they don't also share the other half, so therefore all of the human half would be devoted to society and food production (including animals of course, yummy!).
Image
Black Six
Moderator
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:34 pm
360 GamerTag: Black 5ix
Location: MD

Post by Black Six »

1) Yes.
2) No.
3) Colonize the moon. (Or B.)
"It's not that life's so short, it's just that you're dead for so long." -Anonymous
Threads Closerized: Lost Track, Whoops
underclocked
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:51 am
Location: Indiana

Post by underclocked »

1. Yes
2. No
3. B
grossaffe
Posts: 1450
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:54 pm
Location: USA

Post by grossaffe »

bacteria wrote:"Yes" and "No" answers are only useful for a poll, not homework as such as I am sure you have to justify your comments and choices? (as you say, it is an "essay" after all).
I figure he's polling us and then citing the poll in the essay he has to write.
Gordon1
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Gordon1 »

Yes
No (no need, we are not overpopulated)
B
Jongamer
Senior Member
Posts: 2151
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:43 pm
PSN Username: Geekystig790
360 GamerTag: Mesu Gitsune
Location: Fairborn, Ohio

Post by Jongamer »

1: No (Yes if we were the cause)
2: Yes (Too many lazy people with more than 2 kids that are on welfare, and not getting jobs)
3: B
lifeisbetterwithketchup
Senior Member
Posts: 2180
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:08 pm
Steam ID: lifeisbetterwithketchup
Location: Illinois. Whee.

Post by lifeisbetterwithketchup »

Yes
No
B
Rekarp wrote:
mako321 wrote:What makes you head ninja, anyways? :wink:
Cause I am Abe F#!@ing Lincoln. :mrgreen:
Kurt_
Portablizer
Posts: 5748
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:32 am
Steam ID: kurbert
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Kurt_ »

1) Is the protection of endangered species a cause worthy of our (the human species) attention and resources? (yes/no)

2) China allows couples to have just one child, with few exceptions, as a method of population control. Would you welcome such a policy in your government? (yes/no)

3) Imagine a world on which one half is covered by human development and the other by natural habitats. No free space exists. Would you A) choose to preserve the natural habitats around you at the expense of humans lives (starvation), or B) choose to build farms at the expense of the natural habitats? (A/B)

1 Yes.
2 Yes, if it was an issue in Canada. It's better than future crises or war/killing due to overpopulation.
3 A. Humans are disgusting creatures. One species is less than the all of the rest of the species on this planet.
Hey, sup?
teraflop122
Posts: 1212
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 9:06 pm

Post by teraflop122 »

By the way, I'm throwing out question number 3 because the world it presents is too overly simple.
Valium
Posts: 1412
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:08 pm
Location: Nova Scotia, I'm over from kurt

Post by Valium »

Yes
Yes
A
Image
gamemasterAS
Senior Member
Posts: 3310
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:30 pm
Steam ID: lolz1337face
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by gamemasterAS »

Yes
No
.
Aguiluz
Posts: 1141
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:58 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Aguiluz »

1) Is the protection of endangered species a cause worthy of our (the human species) attention and resources? (yes/no)
Yes. Definitely. They are very rare and people will be sorry if they can't see them IRL.
2) China allows couples to have just one child, with few exceptions, as a method of population control. Would you welcome such a policy in your government? (yes/no)
No.
Image
Post Reply