Halo DS is Real (But was Cancelled) Proof with Videos

Jongamer · Post by **Jongamer** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:12 pm

Here is Full-proof that Halo DS was the Real deal.

But for reasons unknown (I think Microsoft got pis*y and refused to let them release it) It was never further developed.

And the Game accually looks surprisingly good.

Full-motion video of it and everything.

Videos is in the Link below \/\/\/

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=21394

And it looks like it was pretty much based off of Halo 2.[/b]

jeroen · Post by **jeroen** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:16 pm

I think I saw this same thing wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY back in this same forums. It's hardly "proof" it's easily facked

Jongamer · Post by **Jongamer** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:18 pm

did you even watch the Vid?

Post by **CronoTriggerfan** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:32 pm

jeroen wrote:I think I saw this same thing wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY back in this same forums. It's hardly "proof" it's easily facked

It's IGN, I'd say it's pretty legit. Unless it's a big rig by them, but I doubt it.

CTFan

Jongamer · Post by **Jongamer** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:49 pm

I dought somone would go through this much work just for a joke.

I beleived IGN even when there was no proof of a Halo DS, Mainly because its my dream to play Halo for DS, My favorite company's portable mixed with one of my most favorite FPS.

Yeah Im a nintendo nut, i've been one since I was like 3, I was always a nintendo person, and the first time I saw sonic the Hedge hog on my cousin's Sega Genesis, I was like "meh I got better games on my SNES"
Sonic never interested me till Sonic Adventure 2 battle on the Gamecube.

Now I have PS2/Xbox(Modded YAY!!)/Genesis/Dreamcast and hopefully soon a 360

My first non-Nintendo system was PS1 (But I got a N64 like 2 or 3 years before

)

Ok I will shutup about my life story, I'm sure you guys don't care

Twisted Warthog · Post by **Twisted Warthog** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:08 pm

I heard that this is just a re-skin of GoldenEye Rouge Agent. Makes sense.

cowsgoquack101 · Post by **cowsgoquack101** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:14 pm

I don't think Microsoft got pissy, just so much that the company that was developing would've charged for this and they didn't pay royalties. I'm sure you wouldn't want people making money off of your cash cow. Same reason why Nintendo would shut down development of a Mario game for the 360.

Post by **marshallh** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:30 pm

It's just a internal tech demo made to pitch for the Halo license. There was not any "fully complete ready to play" release ever made. It was never developed past the point you see in the videos.

It is interesting the see a Halo level on the DS. But it is never going to happen.

jeroen · Post by **jeroen** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:43 pm

marshalls version sounds best.

Twisted Warthog · Post by **Twisted Warthog** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:43 pm

I'm pretty sure it was proven just to be a re-skin.

Why the hell would Bungie make a game for Nintendo in the first place.

benol · Post by **benol** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:48 pm

Twisted Warthog wrote:Why the hell would Bungie make a game for Nintendo in the first place.

To make money. Why would Rare make Diddy Kong Racing DS after Microsoft bought them?

Post by **Black Six** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:08 am

Twisted Warthog wrote:I'm pretty sure it was proven just to be a re-skin.

Why the hell would Bungie make a game for Nintendo in the first place.

Reportedly it wasn't made by Bungie, but by an outside developer that wanted to license the property.

Twisted Warthog · Post by **Twisted Warthog** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:29 am

They made Diddy Kong Racing DS because Nintendo still has the rights to Diddy Kong Racing and the Donkey Kong Franchise since it was released on the N64.

Super Cameraman · Post by **Super Cameraman** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:18 pm

HAHA!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8JTKXOStik

Twisted Warthog is right!

benol · Post by **benol** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:23 pm

Twisted Warthog wrote:They made Diddy Kong Racing DS because Nintendo still has the rights to Diddy Kong Racing and the Donkey Kong Franchise since it was released on the N64.

The big N doesn't own the rights to DKR. Rare does. Also, Rare owns the rights to Diddy Kong and all related characters. Just not Donkey Kong. Nintendo couldn't just make a game called "Diddy Kong's Adventure" or something like that. They would have to obtain the rights from Rare. On another note, would that mean if Nintendo wanted a Banjo Kazooie DS, then Rare would have to make it? Banjo Kazooie was on the N64. Rare is, however, making Banjo Threeie (REALLY CRAPPY NAME!) for the Xbox360.