Finally... the touchscreen iPod (will suck balls)
Moderator: Moderators
-
lifeisbetterwithketchup
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:08 pm
- Steam ID: lifeisbetterwithketchup
- Location: Illinois. Whee.
-
warmachine
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:33 am
- Location: Ferris, Texas, USA
I have an entire 250 GB HD devoted to nothing but music, and it is full. Actually, around last Thanksgiving (day-after sales) I had to purchase another 250 GB one to start supporting overflow.bicostp wrote:How many people honestly fill their 50+ gig devices to capacity and listen to / watch everything on it on a consistent basis anyways?
Yes, I own that much [legal] music. It is the amalgamation of four inherited CD, LP, and concert recording collections. The CD collections were my parents' (they're still alive, just in case that implied the wrong thing there) and date back to the first ever produced CDs (they owned a CDP-101 at one point - the world's first home CD player, a Sony product as well mind you). The LP collection ranges from gifts to purchases I have made to more inherited albums. The live recordings are lossless audio and comprise the bulk of the storage space (not sure how much, exactly); there's a lot of Zeppelin, some Floyd, Dylan, Beatles, White Stripes, Who, Robert Plant, David Gilmour, Roger Waters, Hendrix, and a few other bands.
But yes, 250+ gigs of music which currently all comfortable resides on my 5G 60 gig (lossless music downscaled to lossy formats, such as mp3s - that's about a 20-something MB file down to a 3 MB file) with a couple of gigs left for videos: Port Washington, Shawn of the Dead, and Pi.
NUCLEAR
warmachine wrote:The CD collections were my parents' (they're still alive, just in case that implied the wrong thing there) and date back to the first ever produced CDs (they owned a CDP-101 at one point - the world's first home CD player, a Sony product as well mind you).
[...]with a couple of gigs left for videos: Port Washington, Shawn of the Dead, and Pi.
I've heard good things about Pi, how is it?
Well you aren't normal. I have a 250GB Hard Drive, and I still have 195GB Free. Worst yet is that not all of that is just Music, it's everything! From the 9 Steam Games, UT 2004, WoW, to Word Documents, Videos (Like 4 Pirated recent ones) and my Music.warmachine wrote:But yes, 250+ gigs of music which currently all comfortable resides on my 5G 60 gig (lossless music downscaled to lossy formats, such as mp3s - that's about a 20-something MB file down to a 3 MB file) with a couple of gigs left for videos: Port Washington, Shawn of the Dead, and Pi.
One question, do you actually listen to every single song or do you pick favorites? No way in Hell would I rip a 150MB CD when I could just take the one song and use only 3-5MB.
Developers have discovered an exploit which means by tricking people onto a website, they can totally take over the iPhone/Touch. This means that all the users personal data can be stolen and the phone can be hijacked to call stupidly expensive numbers

-
warmachine
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:33 am
- Location: Ferris, Texas, USA
I'm a rather enthusiastic audiophile and I do listen to most of what I own on a somewhat [sic] regular basis. There's just so much of it to hear that it typically takes me a few months to listen to a good sampling of everything I own. I will admit, a lot of the concert recordings I own have multiple duplicate songs and they do not always get listened to; however, each concert has its own feel and emotions and, like choosing a wine, I choose a date which best appeals to my current tastes.Harshboy wrote:One question, do you actually listen to every single song or do you pick favorites? No way in Hell would I rip a 150MB CD when I could just take the one song and use only 3-5MB.
I may not listen to every single song consecutively, but I have listened to every song in my archive at least three or four times (more popular songs obviously receiving a greater number of plays).
"Pi" is very good and definitely worth a watch, especially if you are into complex, suspenseful plots. Alternatively (and infinitely more complexly), you can and should view "Primer;" it's hard to find for sale, but Blockbuster has it for rent/purchase. It's a bit legendary for it's incredible production on such a meager budget (~$7000 USD), but it's one multiple awards and took the Grand Jury Prize at Cannes, if that serves as any indication of it's value. It is, simply put, raw science-fiction, and perhaps the most authentic and "real" sci-fi movie since 2001 [the movie, not the year]. Seriously, watch it.THON wrote:That CD player must have been expensive! I wish I had some '80s CD's...
I've heard good things about Pi, how is it?
Also, the CD player was stolen when I was about three, so even in 1990 it was still somewhat valuable I suppose (I'm looking for one still today to hear what it sounds like).
NUCLEAR
Just 'cuase you say, doesn't make it true. Stupid head man.
Couple things of importance:
-Apple's only guilty of one thing. It's not poor products or service. Quite the contrary they do have a good reputation of reliable easy-to-use products and quite helpful tech support. What they are doing wrong is over-saturating the market. Considering I just got an iPod (the 5g 80gb which I have filled to the brim and could use more space, but I work in lossless) and now there's a new model. That's pretty shabby.
-As I said above, and criticism on iPod being "too big" are about as misplaced as they can be. Guess what, boys, size DOES matters, and even the misses knows it. And apple knows it. Since they've put out the apple lossless codec they've popularized the idea that music can retain quality even when it's digital. Where ever I and my audiophilic friends can, we use .m4a. And there are a lot of audiophiles out there, certainly enough to justify a 160gb iPod. And I imagine PLEANTY of people will be able to use it to it's full capacity, lossless or not.
-The iPod touch is catering to a specific crowd. People how didn't want the iPhone but liked the concepts of the iPhone's GUI. So get over it.
-The iPod nano is ugly as sin. Incidentally, this is because the broke a fundamental law of design known as the Principle of Unequal Spacing, which is enhanced in a vertical layout, as seen in he iPod nano. This even break of the ipod, plus the oversized screen plus the undersized scroll-wheel is what makes it look ugly as sin.
-WiFi does not mean internet. It mean wireless networking. Find free wifi you get free internet service. Find free network jacks and you get the same thing. My school's campus has both all around. It's quite nice. Wifi is simply less secure, even if only a little bit (or a lot).
I miss lists.
-Apple's only guilty of one thing. It's not poor products or service. Quite the contrary they do have a good reputation of reliable easy-to-use products and quite helpful tech support. What they are doing wrong is over-saturating the market. Considering I just got an iPod (the 5g 80gb which I have filled to the brim and could use more space, but I work in lossless) and now there's a new model. That's pretty shabby.
-As I said above, and criticism on iPod being "too big" are about as misplaced as they can be. Guess what, boys, size DOES matters, and even the misses knows it. And apple knows it. Since they've put out the apple lossless codec they've popularized the idea that music can retain quality even when it's digital. Where ever I and my audiophilic friends can, we use .m4a. And there are a lot of audiophiles out there, certainly enough to justify a 160gb iPod. And I imagine PLEANTY of people will be able to use it to it's full capacity, lossless or not.
-The iPod touch is catering to a specific crowd. People how didn't want the iPhone but liked the concepts of the iPhone's GUI. So get over it.
-The iPod nano is ugly as sin. Incidentally, this is because the broke a fundamental law of design known as the Principle of Unequal Spacing, which is enhanced in a vertical layout, as seen in he iPod nano. This even break of the ipod, plus the oversized screen plus the undersized scroll-wheel is what makes it look ugly as sin.
-WiFi does not mean internet. It mean wireless networking. Find free wifi you get free internet service. Find free network jacks and you get the same thing. My school's campus has both all around. It's quite nice. Wifi is simply less secure, even if only a little bit (or a lot).
I miss lists.
-Luke
-
bicostp
- Moderator
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
- Steam ID: bicostp
- Location: Spamalot
- Contact:
Re: Just 'cuase you say, doesn't make it true. Stupid head m
Finally someone mentions that! The screen dwarfs the click wheel and makes it look topheavy and fat. The 2G Nano (like mine), where the screen is about the same size as the click wheel, looks like a skinny iPod. It's a more eye-pleasing combination. Adding video playback kind of sucks too, since the screen's so small.Lucretius wrote:-The iPod nano is ugly as sin. Incidentally, this is because the broke a fundamental law of design known as the Principle of Unequal Spacing, which is enhanced in a vertical layout, as seen in he iPod nano. This even break of the ipod, plus the oversized screen plus the undersized scroll-wheel is what makes it look ugly as sin.
By fattening the Nano and adding unnecessary features, they ruined almost everything I liked about the old one. (It's is still flash-based, right?)
Of course not, but it says "WiFi web browsing" right on the product description page.-WiFi does not mean internet. It mean wireless networking. Find free wifi you get free internet service. Find free network jacks and you get the same thing. My school's campus has both all around. It's quite nice. Wifi is simply less secure, even if only a little bit (or a lot).
I still think they should have marketed the Touch as a PDA instead of an iPod. (:lol: iNewton)
Twitter
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
-
Triton
- Moderator
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
- 360 GamerTag: triton199
- Steam ID: triton199
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
wow, your probably the only person on this forum who has/had a cd player that predates mine! i am the proud owner of a Bang&Olufsen Beogram CDX from october 1985The CD collections were my parents' (they're still alive, just in case that implied the wrong thing there) and date back to the first ever produced CDs (they owned a CDP-101 at one point - the world's first home CD player, a Sony product as well mind you).
Visit us at Portablesofdoom.org
-
warmachine
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:33 am
- Location: Ferris, Texas, USA
Oh man, you own a Beogram?? Our neighbor had one when I was but a wee lad. For those of you that have never seen one, it is the DeLorean of CD players. Observe:Triton wrote:wow, your probably the only person on this forum who has/had a cd player that predates mine! i am the proud owner of a Bang&Olufsen Beogram CDX from october 1985The CD collections were my parents' (they're still alive, just in case that implied the wrong thing there) and date back to the first ever produced CDs (they owned a CDP-101 at one point - the world's first home CD player, a Sony product as well mind you).


[EDIT] Also, here is the CDP-101; as was Sony's style until the late 90s, it is brickish and unimaginative (in appearance - not to underscore the technology Sony has produced):

NUCLEAR
Re: Just 'cuase you say, doesn't make it true. Stupid head m
Have you held one in real life? I thought it was ugly in the pictures, but then I saw and held one in real life, and it's really not that bad. And video has never been a problem on such a small screen for me.Lucretius wrote:Couple things of importance:
-The iPod nano is ugly as sin. Incidentally, this is because the broke a fundamental law of design known as the Principle of Unequal Spacing, which is enhanced in a vertical layout, as seen in he iPod nano. This even break of the ipod, plus the oversized screen plus the undersized scroll-wheel is what makes it look ugly as sin.

