Cell Phones?

Want to just shoot the breeze? Forum 42 is the place!

Moderator: Moderators

joevennix
Portablizer
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:34 am
Location: On permanent vacation from reality.

Post by joevennix »

Bibin wrote:I'll tell you what - overpricement for hardware that isn't very spectacular. From a technical perspective, the MacBook is pitiful. No video card! And I own one, and Mac OS X is certainly NOT the most advanced system ever. It's the simplest, and most simple-person friendly. It makes more advanced things actually more difficult due to the interface getting in my way. You also can't change the shiny white and blue crap. Windows XP, on this MacBook here, though, runs much faster than OS X does on this laptop. It's not because of used HD space either. I've barely used the OS X partition.

Other then apple saying "WIR GRATE LOL IT'S OSX 4 REALS", how do you know that the iPhone OS X is not a brand new OS that resembles and acts like OS X? It's like a simulation of OS X, not unlike the Game and Watch games you can download. It's a recoding of OS X, but technically, it's not the real OS X.

I'll only believe it's the real OS X once I see

a) A Darwin Prompt
b) Cave Story running on it.
c) iCrap (iChat) running on it.

The 'safari' that runs on it is not the same slow, pitiful safari found on the computer. It's completely different. If it was a real OS X, that was just leopard, other than screen difference, it wouldn't look so different.
Mehh... I use a mac all the time, but I still don't think this iPhone is the most groundbreaking thing ever. I'd rather have something that runs Palm OS and allows 3rd party development (yes, I've watched the WWDC keynote, and heard Jobs' statement of allowing 'development that won't comprimise security' or something... I figure this means developers will either have to get a license, or will have strict limitations on resources available). I highly doubt it runs a real version of OS X, as that would require a ton of resources that the iPhone doesn't seem to have. Probably a cut-back imitation. The coolest thing, I think, that could happen is if you could use the Terminal. That'd be awesome. But not probable, think of the security risks... :-/

iChat? iChat blows. I've used OS X for a long time, and I've never liked iChat. If AdiumX was ported to the iPhone, that would be money in the bank. The only time I ever use iChat is for AV chats. Although the new Leopard features that let you put effects in your video chats look cool. Entertaining, at least for a few minutes.

I have a lot of questions about the iPhone, is it going to allow multiple applications, will it have a JVM, etc. I'm not really too interested in it, to tell the truth, it's sort of a neat little gimmick that I think really should only be used by businessmen. I mean, if I had $500 just sitting around, I'd take one (over a PS3 at least). If it had a keyboard, a little more processing power, and a lot more memory, and could run Windows XP as well, I'd buy it for sure. :) Can't win em all I guess. But you know tons of people will buy it for no reason.

I do have to disagree with your point about Safari. It opens up a hella lot faster than Firefox, runs faster, doesn't freeze my computer half as much. It's just a nimble sort of app, since it was natively written instead of ported. Not sure about how well it'll run on the iPhone though... we'll have to wait and see.

And oh yeah, you can change the theme of Mac OS X. Google 'ShapeShifter.' It's just not included in the OS, but it is supported.

Whew long post
-Joe
Image
Bibin
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by Bibin »

Oh yes, safari's faster then Firefox. I dislike both, personally.
Dr. KillGood
Senior Member
Posts: 2209
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:03 am
Location: Earth

Post by Dr. KillGood »

Ok I need help here, I talked to the people at the phone store and I get a $100 discount for renewing my plan or something! It also goes with any discount the phone comes with!

I cant decided between the

LG enV (ShouldI get the orange 1?)
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/stor ... oneId=2694

OR the samsung
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/stor ... oneId=2951

I need to know can either one emulate a NES/SNES if so they I will buy that 1. I tried google cant find anything...
Image
bicostp
Moderator
Posts: 10491
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
Steam ID: bicostp
Location: Spamalot
Contact:

Post by bicostp »

If you want to do emulation, get a real smartphone, not one of these things. (Meaning one running Windows Mobile or Palm OS.) There's a chance one o fthose will do emulation but I wouldn't bet on it.

Honestly I haven't been impressed with any of the emulators I've run on my Axim X30 (Windows Mobile 2003). If you want emulation, get a PSP or GP2X.

If you want a phone, get a phone, not a wannabe Treo.
Post Reply