I've also seen over 4GB of music from a friends of iPod, and he listens mainly to stuff like AC/DC, Metallica, Areosmith, Godsmack, eminem, ect. The biggest adantage to having over 2GB storage for music is that you can listen to music that suits your mood.Lucretius wrote:Once you pass 2gb, what you're buying is conveniece. Rather have to add and replace music later on down the road, you can keep a great deal of your library with you at all times and simply pick and choose what you're lsitening to. For some people that's not a selling point, which is fine. For me, it is, and I'm actually getting a sweet deal on a Creative Zen Sleek (maybe photo) for christmas this year. Sweeeeeet.Electric Rain wrote:I can't imagine wanting more than 2GB on music on there at once. I'd never hear the same song more than once!
So I'm finally going to buy an mp3 player
Moderator: Moderators
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too
I am a geek.
-
Electric Rain
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:39 pm
- PSN Username: Denki_no_Ame
- Location: What's it to you? Stalker...
Meh, yeah, I guess... With that much space (20-40GB as seen in most MP3 players) you can also use it as a mass storage device (like a USB thumb drive/pen drive/whatever) for other files. Plus you could put your ENTIRE music collection on it, to save lots and lots of hard drive space on your computer, or just to have a back-up. Yeah, I understand that... uhoh... I'm starting to think about alternatives! 

-
Sir Games-A-Lot
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:25 am
- Location: Sitting around a table wishing the king would get IBM Consultants
Cool player, I like how most of the Creative MP3 players have metal cases, makes them much harder to destroy externally. And yeah go for the larger capacity, I mean that adds up to about a buck per extra GB how can you go wrong
. I just ordered a Buslink iBot
for 53.99 post paid off ebay, yes I know it has less than one GB, but guess what my entire music collection is less than one GB
! It was a toss up between the iBot and a 1 GB Nano clone from ebay, what won me over was the internal speakers on the iBot plus it was slightly cheaper. And if I ever find myself really needing the space in a year or two (by which time Nano clone prices will have dropped some) I will just buy the clone for about the same price and be huge geek and carry both! 
for 53.99 post paid off ebay, yes I know it has less than one GB, but guess what my entire music collection is less than one GB
<a href="http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_cg.php?im">
<img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/cg.php?val=5780" alt="My computer geek score is greater than 83% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!"> </a>
<img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/cg.php?val=5780" alt="My computer geek score is greater than 83% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!"> </a>
Probably. All I know is iPod is expensive, yet it's battery lifespan is short. Like my laptop and basically anything I buy that doesn't use good old AA/AAA/C/D/9V/etc. batteries and instead opts to use rechargable lithium Ion batteries.Triton wrote:totokan wow, you totally changed gears right in the middle of your post lol, was the ipod bit scarcasm?
Shhh! I'm not officially back yet.
-
Sir Games-A-Lot
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:25 am
- Location: Sitting around a table wishing the king would get IBM Consultants
You could always make an external powerpak for the 'pod with standard cells if the internal battery is dead. Like this dude:
http://www.chrisdiclerico.com/2004/10/2 ... ry-pack-v2
http://www.chrisdiclerico.com/2004/10/2 ... ry-pack-v2
<a href="http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_cg.php?im">
<img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/cg.php?val=5780" alt="My computer geek score is greater than 83% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!"> </a>
<img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/cg.php?val=5780" alt="My computer geek score is greater than 83% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!"> </a>
Ah nice link but Lady Ada's design would work better as all iPods (after 3G) and really all other MP3 players use USB. Be sure to check her site to see if the charger work with your MP3 player.
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too
I am a geek.
well for most 4 gigs isnt enough to store all of their music.
i know that i personally may only listen to 10 or so bands at a time (i go through fazes) but sometimes i'm just in the mood to turn on something heavier like the RHCP or something, and at those times its nice to have my 12 gig collection of music.
Also, quality has a lot to do with how much space you need. I hook up my ipod to speakers quite a bit and play it in the car, so i need atleast a good 256 kbps...
i know that i personally may only listen to 10 or so bands at a time (i go through fazes) but sometimes i'm just in the mood to turn on something heavier like the RHCP or something, and at those times its nice to have my 12 gig collection of music.
Also, quality has a lot to do with how much space you need. I hook up my ipod to speakers quite a bit and play it in the car, so i need atleast a good 256 kbps...
sam fisher wrote:Are you implying that you, the SnesP shuriken throwing ninja, are a programmer?
-
cowsgoquack101
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:21 am
- Steam ID: cowsgoquack101
- Location: Cold, grey Indiana!
-
Reploid Ayla
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:08 pm
- Location: Portland
Im looking at a Creative Zen touch right now, and I would say save your money. Im actually not using it, because it would take hours to half work on my linux. As for iPod... I have already used 3+ on my machine, and they have all worked just fine. I say throw down the 169 bucks for a "referbished" 4gen 20 gig. It will be brand new, mostly because it would be impossible for them to sell the entire old stock of outdated units.
this is coming from someone who has used both products for extended periods of time.
this is coming from someone who has used both products for extended periods of time.
I've dropped my Zen Xtra from over 4 feet onto solid concrete, didn't do anything but dent the case a bit.Xiro wrote:Well i for one had a horrible experience with a Ceative Zen Xtra.
The program that it comes with for organizing music absolutely sucks, iTunes is 10 times better, and if you arent careful with a creative, you are screwed. I dropped mine 3 feet onto carpet and the hard drive broke and i was left out in the dark because the warrenty that they gave me was only 6 months. I'm suprised that it even lasted that long though.
Say what you want about ipods, but they look cool, have a nice screen, great wheel interface, and never break down.
The only thing I have against the Xtra is the size and weight, it's a freaking brick. Everyone I know makes fun of me because of it, ooh iPods are so tiny, who cares. I'd rather have large capacity for less money. I got mine for my birthday, 30gb model for 150 bucks. Vs. the iPods at about 300 for 30gb. Soyeah.
I'd suggest against this model though if you have the money to spare. I'd get either the Creative Zen Vision:M or an iRiver H100/H300 or an iAudio X5 or 6.
They all have great audio quality, large capacities, long battery life, and they aren't iPod.

-
Triton
- Moderator
- Posts: 7398
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
- 360 GamerTag: triton199
- Steam ID: triton199
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
little price comparison 
sandisk sansa e270 6GB = 185$
Ipod nano 4GB = 250$
sandisk sansa e250 2gb = 125$
ipod nano 2gb = 197$
the sansa is barely bigger than the nano,
1.74" W x 3.5" L x 0.56" D VS 1.6" W x 3.5" L x 0.27" D honestly why get a nano at all when this is more for less money!
pic of the sansa

sandisk sansa e270 6GB = 185$
Ipod nano 4GB = 250$
sandisk sansa e250 2gb = 125$
ipod nano 2gb = 197$
the sansa is barely bigger than the nano,
1.74" W x 3.5" L x 0.56" D VS 1.6" W x 3.5" L x 0.27" D honestly why get a nano at all when this is more for less money!
pic of the sansa

Visit us at Portablesofdoom.org
FYI, that thing is over 2 times as thick as the nano - hardly "barely bigger"Triton wrote:little price comparison
sandisk sansa e270 6GB = 185$
Ipod nano 4GB = 250$
sandisk sansa e250 2gb = 125$
ipod nano 2gb = 197$
the sansa is barely bigger than the nano,
1.74" W x 3.5" L x 0.56" D VS 1.6" W x 3.5" L x 0.27" D honestly why get a nano at all when this is more for less money!
pic of the sansa
sam fisher wrote:Are you implying that you, the SnesP shuriken throwing ninja, are a programmer?

