some of you are talking avout dvd quality like this is some pristine picture filmed on hollywood calibre equipment and digitally processed for maximum picture enhancement. i have a feeling the finished product is actually slightly below typical "dvd quality". not that that is bad or anything; im not saying that the the quality is crappy - just that making this into a 3gb file is incredibly excessive, considering you are going to try to distribute it online.
1.4 gigs is probably pushing it too. and i dont think theres any reason to split it into two files, if someone dosent have a dvd burner yet, then splitting the file can be their problem. in my opinion, this should be done with divx, because thats a nice, universal standard (some dvd players even can play it thse days - mine can!), and should end up being about 700mb. most of the movies i have downloaded (not many. maybe 6) are in this format, i think it works quite well. besides. offeing a less-than-perfect quality version encourages people to go buy the real dvd
as for bittorrent, if you dont know what it is, then maybe you should just google it and find out. it is very useful, and i have never seen better transfer rates or reliablilty from a filesharing system. for those of you who dont torrent yet, check out some software called utorrent. its got some cool features.
and i would be willing to seed as well, i think i got about 60kBps upstream for what its worth (stupid ADSL. i think we're getting cable soon)
[and if youre behind a router, you may have to forward ports (harder) or set up a DMZ (easier)]