Star Wars VS the Romans
Moderator: Moderators
-
gamer2
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 12:38 pm
- Location: You spam, SANTA Jason gets you!
- Contact:
Star Wars VS the Romans
i have noiticed certain aspects betweeen Star Wars and The Romans.
Star Wars
-----------
Near the End of Repiblic, it was spit in to parts(ep 2)
pretty much ruled all the known universe
The Empireness was voted for
When it was an Empire there was major Rebelions
Romans
---------
Near the End or reform it got spit into two parts
Ruled known world at the time
They voted for there first Emperor
Lots of Rebelions
Star Wars
-----------
Near the End of Repiblic, it was spit in to parts(ep 2)
pretty much ruled all the known universe
The Empireness was voted for
When it was an Empire there was major Rebelions
Romans
---------
Near the End or reform it got spit into two parts
Ruled known world at the time
They voted for there first Emperor
Lots of Rebelions


they also had a defunct emperor, the romans had many,(most of whom were murdered, and star wars had palpatine.
Need unique content writer for your website? Check out http://www.uniquecontentcreation.com/
-
Gamelver
- Moderator
- Posts: 3352
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 9:03 pm
- Location: in my basement, to forever work on portables ;)
yup...the Romans DEFINITELY were trying to copy Star Wars
.....(you know how I know?!?!?....A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away
)

and +1500ish years ago is NOT a "long time ago"....ok, so maybe it is, but not like Star wars
!!!
and +1500ish years ago is NOT a "long time ago"....ok, so maybe it is, but not like Star wars
Without games my life would have no meaning.
Well, I guess it would, but it would be a lot less fun!!!!!!!

Well, I guess it would, but it would be a lot less fun!!!!!!!

-
cowsgoquack101
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:21 am
- Steam ID: cowsgoquack101
- Location: Cold, grey Indiana!
-
nos_slived
- Higher Idiot
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:32 pm
- Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
- Contact:
-
cowsgoquack101
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1981
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:21 am
- Steam ID: cowsgoquack101
- Location: Cold, grey Indiana!
-
Reploid Ayla
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:08 pm
- Location: Portland
If you want to be spicific about comparisons, Pallpatin would be like Ceaser. He was a (equivilent) president and when war broke out he took the role to ensure that he could stay in office so that a new offical didnt have to pick up where he left off. But Ceaser didnt give it up and ended up making Rome in to an Empire that was ruled by a family.
Now it was latter that Rome split into to about 200 A.D. I believe. I guess you can say the Empire (or the part that was at Endor) was the Western Empire cause that one fell first. Then there's whats left fighting the New Republic, so they could be construed as the Eastern Empire.
And to model it after WWII would only fit if the Empire was Nazi Germany and Hitler came to power during war. But he came to power in a time of peace and depression. However I can see the simalarities of Pallpatin and Hitler, both crazy and hell!
Now it was latter that Rome split into to about 200 A.D. I believe. I guess you can say the Empire (or the part that was at Endor) was the Western Empire cause that one fell first. Then there's whats left fighting the New Republic, so they could be construed as the Eastern Empire.
And to model it after WWII would only fit if the Empire was Nazi Germany and Hitler came to power during war. But he came to power in a time of peace and depression. However I can see the simalarities of Pallpatin and Hitler, both crazy and hell!
vskid wrote:Nerd = likes school, does all their homework, dies if they don't get 100% on every assignment
Geek = likes technology, dies if the power goes out and his UPS dies too
I am a geek.

