Nightvision on the cheap: Help me out.
Moderator: Moderators
-
Kurt_
- Portablizer
- Posts: 5748
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:32 am
- Steam ID: kurbert
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Nightvision on the cheap: Help me out.
So I'm looking to make some sort of nightvision using a digital camera as a starting point.
I have two donated to me, and I'm currently screwing with the cheap 2 megapixel, no zoom model.
So far I've removed the infrared filter on top of the CMOS chip. However, what is displayed on the LCD is still very dark compared to what I can see with my naked eye. My question to you: Would amplifying the red line (where I assume the infrared is being absorbed, based on one graph I saw for a possibly similar CMOS sensor) create a clearer picture? Where would be the best place to put said amplifier? By the CMOS chip? By the LCD input?
I know none of you have done this, stabs in the dark are acceptable responses, they're good for ideas.
I was thinking an amplifyer using a simple transistor setup would work, but I'm also thinking It'd be nice to have the ability to adjust the amplification based on light levels (ie. a Pot/transistor setup?)
Help with that circuit?
I have two donated to me, and I'm currently screwing with the cheap 2 megapixel, no zoom model.
So far I've removed the infrared filter on top of the CMOS chip. However, what is displayed on the LCD is still very dark compared to what I can see with my naked eye. My question to you: Would amplifying the red line (where I assume the infrared is being absorbed, based on one graph I saw for a possibly similar CMOS sensor) create a clearer picture? Where would be the best place to put said amplifier? By the CMOS chip? By the LCD input?
I know none of you have done this, stabs in the dark are acceptable responses, they're good for ideas.
I was thinking an amplifyer using a simple transistor setup would work, but I'm also thinking It'd be nice to have the ability to adjust the amplification based on light levels (ie. a Pot/transistor setup?)
Help with that circuit?
Hey, sup?
-
Ben Cebhrem
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:00 am
I would assume right after where image processing would be ideal for clarifying and strengthening the red line; omitting the other line (or somehow blanking them out, idk). Of course, you'd need a way to strengthen and clarify it without boosting the voltage beyond anything that can safely display it (i.e., don't pump so much voltage in the line that you blow a screen).
Then again, it's the red sensors on the sensor-picture-taking-thingie that matter the most- a strong signal from them, and likely only them, would yield the most useful image, wouldn't you agree? In the end, that may not matter, but it could be a point of contention.
Then again, it's the red sensors on the sensor-picture-taking-thingie that matter the most- a strong signal from them, and likely only them, would yield the most useful image, wouldn't you agree? In the end, that may not matter, but it could be a point of contention.
-
TAFKA_Cennar
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:30 am
-
Super Cameraman
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:25 pm
Wait, all you're doing is removing the IR filter?
That won't do anything to make the image brighter, you have to use IR lights now and wire them to a battery.
(sorry if that's what you are doing, but I couldn't find it in the thread)
That won't do anything to make the image brighter, you have to use IR lights now and wire them to a battery.
(sorry if that's what you are doing, but I couldn't find it in the thread)
If you're looking at this post and it was made before 2008, just ignore it.
-
Kurt_
- Portablizer
- Posts: 5748
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:32 am
- Steam ID: kurbert
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
I'm kind of going with the flow. That's all I've done SO FAR.
Doing that really sucks. Using an IR LED from a TV remote still sucks. I need to amplify the electrons converted by the CMOS sensor, and quite possibly slap an expensive lens on the front of the camera so more photons are converted in the first place.
Doing that really sucks. Using an IR LED from a TV remote still sucks. I need to amplify the electrons converted by the CMOS sensor, and quite possibly slap an expensive lens on the front of the camera so more photons are converted in the first place.
Hey, sup?
There was a guy on instructables that made a homemade Night vision where he used some IR LEDs but they had essentially three LED's in each. He used 8 of these I believe, bought a IR camera and hooked it up to a view finder from an old video camera.
Since you took the IR filter off of your camera then that should work. and then just have a large IR LED bank that can put out a lot of IR light to light up things around you. Of course this would probably only work for things close to you but then again you could get a LED flashlight and replace them all with IR to shine longer distances.
I searched for the instructable but couldn't find it anymore... Google search brought up some stuff though but not the one I had seen.
Hope this helps.
Since you took the IR filter off of your camera then that should work. and then just have a large IR LED bank that can put out a lot of IR light to light up things around you. Of course this would probably only work for things close to you but then again you could get a LED flashlight and replace them all with IR to shine longer distances.
I searched for the instructable but couldn't find it anymore... Google search brought up some stuff though but not the one I had seen.
Hope this helps.
DCP---Done
You arent going to do that much by amplifying the video signal coming from a camera in the dark.
Its kind of like turning up static on the radio.
You need to get an infrared lamp of some sort. Also image processing would help. If you take a picture with the lens covered, it will probably look pretty grainy. Subtracting that from the image will clean it up. The way the background noise in the sensor looks changes slowly over time and improves at lower temperatures...
Its kind of like turning up static on the radio.
You need to get an infrared lamp of some sort. Also image processing would help. If you take a picture with the lens covered, it will probably look pretty grainy. Subtracting that from the image will clean it up. The way the background noise in the sensor looks changes slowly over time and improves at lower temperatures...

"Linux is only free if your time is worthless"
-
Kurt_
- Portablizer
- Posts: 5748
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:32 am
- Steam ID: kurbert
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
http://www.howstuffworks.com/nightvision.htm
A lamp, like THE MOON?
Military night vision works on moonlight. I'm aware I'd need a light source in a house or something, but right now I'm trying to get something that will work with the light emitted by the moon.
A lamp, like THE MOON?
Military night vision works on moonlight. I'm aware I'd need a light source in a house or something, but right now I'm trying to get something that will work with the light emitted by the moon.
Hey, sup?
