Questo o Quella: Does it really matter?
Moderator: Moderators
-
Triton
- Moderator
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
- 360 GamerTag: triton199
- Steam ID: triton199
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
fastest way to world peace is to kill all of the people! no people? no problem! 
Visit us at Portablesofdoom.org
-
bicostp
- Moderator
- Posts: 10491
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:47 pm
- Steam ID: bicostp
- Location: Spamalot
- Contact:
You mean we don't have one now?A crap public welfare program and only the trash of America will bank on.
Twitter
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
http://www.pcwgaming.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If you want a Dropbox account, please use my referral link
-
RockNRoll!
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:00 pm
- Location: on the toilet
-
CronoTriggerfan
- Moderator
- Posts: 4131
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:07 pm
- Location: University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
- Contact:
Point is, who is the lesser of those two evils, and who can actually win this election? A vote for Barr might as well be a vote for piss, it's nothing. Pick the best of the worse; from your list, I'd say one candidate has a longer list than the other...Rekarp wrote:Basically if Bob Barr doesn't win we all lose.
If Osama wins. We get socialism and higher taxes. A crap public welfare program and only the trash of America will bank on. Only good thing? Maybe getting out of Iraqi...maybe... Basically the idea of America "Land of the Free" will be gone as the government will be holding peoples hand and telling us what we can and can not do.
If Mcdonald wins. 4 more years of Bush. More spending and more Iraqi and 9/11 crap.
Good thing I still have 5+ years of college ahead of me so I don't have to pay taxes (woo for tax refunds!) to a socialist government.
We do, but whose fault is that?bicostp wrote:You mean we don't have one now?A crap public welfare program and only the trash of America will bank on.
that kind of thought is the exact reason these two crappy parties have a strangle hold on our political system. Your vote for McCain has just as much chance at affecting the entire election as my vote for Bob Barr. Voting for the lesser of two evils is why we get stuck with terrible options every ****ing election. If we stand up and tell them that they are not guaranteed our votes, then there's a chance they may actually try to do something to earn it.CronoTriggerfan wrote:Point is, who is the lesser of those two evils, and who can actually win this election? A vote for Barr might as well be a vote for piss, it's nothing. Pick the best of the worse; from your list, I'd say one candidate has a longer list than the other...Rekarp wrote:Basically if Bob Barr doesn't win we all lose.
If Osama wins. We get socialism and higher taxes. A crap public welfare program and only the trash of America will bank on. Only good thing? Maybe getting out of Iraqi...maybe... Basically the idea of America "Land of the Free" will be gone as the government will be holding peoples hand and telling us what we can and can not do.
If Mcdonald wins. 4 more years of Bush. More spending and more Iraqi and 9/11 crap.
Good thing I still have 5+ years of college ahead of me so I don't have to pay taxes (woo for tax refunds!) to a socialist government.We do, but whose fault is that?bicostp wrote:You mean we don't have one now?A crap public welfare program and only the trash of America will bank on.
-
CronoTriggerfan
- Moderator
- Posts: 4131
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:07 pm
- Location: University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
- Contact:
PolySci 101: Your vote, ideologically, is useless. I hate the two-party system just as much as anyone else right about now, but you don't change it by pissing away a vote on some Libertarian candidate, but by actually getting involved in the system, getting your ideologies represented, and fighting for a real change. If you aren't willing to do that, then you shouldn't complain.grossaffe wrote:that kind of thought is the exact reason these two crappy parties have a strangle hold on our political system. Your vote for McCain has just as much chance at affecting the entire election as my vote for Bob Barr. Voting for the lesser of two evils is why we get stuck with terrible options every ****ing election. If we stand up and tell them that they are not guaranteed our votes, then there's a chance they may actually try to do something to earn it.
To be honest, I think Bob Barr would be better than either of the two we've got right now. He's fiscally principled, advocates strong law enforcement, and loves the NRA. With the exception of his tyraids about "fascist American intelligence agencies", joining up with ACLU cronies, and his immature belief that "civil liberties" for terrorists are more important than intelligence we'd get from them, he would make a good leader on paper. But that doesn't matter if you read paragraph one carefully.
I am not pissing away my vote. I do not want McCain in office, I do not want Obama in office. I know Barr will not win, but I refuse to compromise my principles just because the Democrats and Republicans have a stranglehold on our political system. As I stated before, the odds of my vote for McCain are just as likely as affecting the outcome of the election as my vote for Barr, but at least with a vote for Barr I won't hate myself.CronoTriggerfan wrote:PolySci 101: Your vote, ideologically, is useless. I hate the two-party system just as much as anyone else right about now, but you don't change it by pissing away a vote on some Libertarian candidate, but by actually getting involved in the system, getting your ideologies represented, and fighting for a real change. If you aren't willing to do that, then you shouldn't complain.grossaffe wrote:that kind of thought is the exact reason these two crappy parties have a strangle hold on our political system. Your vote for McCain has just as much chance at affecting the entire election as my vote for Bob Barr. Voting for the lesser of two evils is why we get stuck with terrible options every ****ing election. If we stand up and tell them that they are not guaranteed our votes, then there's a chance they may actually try to do something to earn it.
I wouldn't expect Barr to be your ideal candidate as you are a conservative. I, however, am a libertarian and do believe in civil liberties. One of the things that I really like about him is that he is both a member of the NRA and the ACLU. However, that is what makes us different and why we should have more than two options for president.To be honest, I think Bob Barr would be better than either of the two we've got right now. He's fiscally principled, advocates strong law enforcement, and loves the NRA. With the exception of his tyraids about "fascist American intelligence agencies", joining up with ACLU cronies, and his immature belief that "civil liberties" for terrorists are more important than intelligence we'd get from them, he would make a good leader on paper. But that doesn't matter if you read paragraph one carefully.
-
Triton
- Moderator
- Posts: 7397
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:33 pm
- 360 GamerTag: triton199
- Steam ID: triton199
- Location: Iowa
- Contact:
our current healthcare system is a steaming pile of crap. at least where i live our hospital is a copulate joke, insurance is insanely expensive unless you have a job where your employer supplies it and even then it tends to be expensive. when i was working at fareway it would have cost me more per month for insurance than i MADE in a month! i havent had health insurance for 7 months since i got kicked off of hawkeye (state funded healthcare for kids up to 18 years of age) and because of my parents income i am probably not eligable for title 19 insurance. so if anything bad happens to me or i get seriously ill im pretty well f***ed financially 
Visit us at Portablesofdoom.org
-
CronoTriggerfan
- Moderator
- Posts: 4131
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 3:07 pm
- Location: University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
- Contact:
So what are you advocating? That the government should give you healthcare?Triton wrote:our current healthcare system is a steaming pile of crap. at least where i live our hospital is a screw joke, insurance is insanely expensive unless you have a job where your employer supplies it and even then it tends to be expensive. when i was working at fareway it would have cost me more per month for insurance than i MADE in a month! i havent had health insurance for 7 months since i got kicked off of hawkeye (state funded healthcare for kids up to 18 years of age) and because of my parents income i am probably not eligable for title 19 insurance. so if anything bad happens to me or i get seriously ill im pretty well f***ed financially
-
SpongeBuell
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5190
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:52 am
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
So did I, but I'm actually glad to see that. Truth is, many countries have universal health care systems, and I'd love to see that here. Insurance companies, including health insurance, do not exist primarily to pay for people to get health care. They exist to be profitable. They add many extra steps to the process of getting the care that is (sometimes urgently) needed. Do you think that this extra step from sickness to treatment pays for itself? No, someone's gotta pay for it. The way I see it, it's extra fat that can be trimmed down, especially the profit that they inherently make from being a for-profit corporation. Commercialism and profiting should have nothing to do with the health and well-being of an actual PERSON. I hate to quote Michael Moore, but he really did say it best, "Health insurance companies are corporations. By law, they are required to be as profitable as possible for the shareholders. How do they make profit? By denying claims."CronoTriggerfan wrote:I really thought that was the most telling part of the debate when Obama called healthcare a "right".
Some may say that a government health care system would be bureaucratic. If we're going to make a new system, why not make it right? you know, from the start? I have a couple friends from Spain, and have heard nothing but good things about their system (which is government supported). Obviously, we've heard quite a bit from our Canadian friends in the other thread about their health care system, more good than bad. Are their taxes higher? Sure. But at least they're actually GETTING something out of it. If nothing else, think about it as buying in bulk.
Life of Brian wrote:I'll be honest with you - I would have never guessed that.RYW wrote:RYW:
Rare
Yellow
Weasel


