That's never been the case, noob.argelfraster wrote:we should do an n64 contest!!!
Winner will be person with best looking portable, not fastest one made ( shockslayer.....)
I think what we did last time was fair.
SS
Moderator: Moderators
That's never been the case, noob.argelfraster wrote:we should do an n64 contest!!!
Winner will be person with best looking portable, not fastest one made ( shockslayer.....)
Yes.Life of Brian wrote: Was it fair and easy to understand?
Agreed. Excellent idea Bac.bacteria wrote:I think there needs to be a minimum amount of entries for the compo to be valid, rather than just two or three entries as in the previous one. How about for example setting in a counter, say to 12 or whatever, each time a portable is entered the counter drops and when at zero the compo ends and voting starts. It isn't a race after all, people can enter multiple times but under certain criteria like it needs to be a created portable console and not just a paintjob or LED mod or something else minor. The counter will provide the drive, especially as the counter gets lower and lower, rather than a tight timespan that isn't easy to meet, especially on more complex portables.
Interesting idea, kind of a race to see who can do quality work fast. We'll have to for sure have criteria set on how far the progress can be at the time the contest starts, so we don't get people entering projects that started from 90%.bacteria wrote:I think there needs to be a minimum amount of entries for the compo to be valid, rather than just two or three entries as in the previous one. How about for example setting in a counter, say to 12 or whatever, each time a portable is entered the counter drops and when at zero the compo ends and voting starts. It isn't a race after all, people can enter multiple times but under certain criteria like it needs to be a created portable console and not just a paintjob or LED mod or something else minor. The counter will provide the drive, especially as the counter gets lower and lower, rather than a tight timespan that isn't easy to meet, especially on more complex portables.
agreed. its a geat idea, but the rule would need to be harsh, and uncompromising.vskid wrote:Interesting idea, kind of a race to see who can do quality work fast. We'll have to for sure have criteria set on how far the progress can be at the time the contest starts, so we don't get people entering projects that started from 90%.bacteria wrote:I think there needs to be a minimum amount of entries for the compo to be valid, rather than just two or three entries as in the previous one. How about for example setting in a counter, say to 12 or whatever, each time a portable is entered the counter drops and when at zero the compo ends and voting starts. It isn't a race after all, people can enter multiple times but under certain criteria like it needs to be a created portable console and not just a paintjob or LED mod or something else minor. The counter will provide the drive, especially as the counter gets lower and lower, rather than a tight timespan that isn't easy to meet, especially on more complex portables.
AfroLH wrote:Yeah well Alcohol adds a little bit of sexyness in my eyes, but I dont drink it all the time.HotDog-Cart wrote: Also, the codename stuff adds a little bit of sexyness, in my eyes.
SpongeBuell wrote:As proof, I offer this picture of a monkey on my head.
Right. As previously stated:bacteria wrote:It isn't a race after all, people can enter multiple times but under certain criteria like it needs to be a created portable console and not just a paintjob or LED mod or something else minor.
I agree about there needing to be a minimum amount of people committed to building portables for there to be a contest, but how about we wait until we hear from more folks if they are interested in participating before we set any numbers.Life of Brian wrote:"I really don't think we should limit it to one platform. If it's a video game console of any type that has been made portable with a screen, batteries, and on-board controls ... "
dragonhead wrote:sweet. ive spent a third of my life on benheck!

Tchay wrote:No he's from Canada.samjc3 wrote:Fire. Youve probably heard of it?
Six weeks is far too short, yet multiple months is too long; it is a balance between keeping interest in the compo going and enough time to make a quality system, given constraints of life, school/work/family/etc. People always seem to want an extension, etc too. That is why I thought the counter idea was better: there is no point having a compo for a couple of entries, I think the best idea Brian is if you decide how many submissions constitutes a worthwhile compo, then use that number as the counter. Have a caviat - if when the counter gets to say 3 then people could contact and say "nearly done, will enter mine in x days", then if the counter gets to zero and theirs isn't in then they be given a little extra time before closing.Life of Brian wrote:Since you mentioned it last year and have mentioned it again here, bacteria, how long is a reasonable time for a contest in your opinion? What does everyone else think?